</font><font color="blue" class="small">( The police are NOT there to protect you. They'll be there in time to take a report."
Stanley, thanks for the defense and, yes, I am insulted by his statement!!! )</font>
You can be insulted as little or as much as you want, but the FACT remains that the US Supreme Court has ruled, in numerous cases, that the citizenry does NOT have a constitutional right to police protection. Now while I will agree that the vast majority of LEOs would do their utmost to protect most citizens, the FACT remains that there is no legal mandate that requires such. Add to that the logistics of rural areas and very busy metros, and there are bound to be times when you are in deep muck if you are not prepared to protect yourself.
Read HERE
Bottom line--I have been burglarized three times, robbed at gunpoint one time, threatened at gunpoint one other time, and in NONE of those instances was there a police officer present to protect me. I am not at all criticizing police for this, just making the obvious point that if police were able to protect us all all of the time there would be no crime. And if the police are required to protect us, then they are not suceeding at their job a tremendous amount of the time.
Let's keep this all in perspective. Fact is most police work is follow up....some is deterrence. All necessary, and without it there would be even more crime. And occasionally a police officer will go to great lengths, even sacrificing his or her life, to protect someone. But they just can't be there all the time.