Why are tractors so under-powered?

   / Why are tractors so under-powered? #62  
Re: Why are tractors so under-powered

I see stuff like this on Power Block TV, they take a 4 cylinder out of a Ford Ranger and put a big V8 back in, why so they can spin tires in high gear and go like a bat out of heaven...

Easy now.... There are many good reasons for putting a big V8 in Ford Rangers. In my case, it's to make it skip across the top of the mud. Whatever your reason, learning to put the power to the ground is just part of it.

97 Ranger with a 557ci BBF.
 
   / Why are tractors so under-powered? #65  
Let me give it a shot here, and I am sure I am gonna repeat alot of what has been said. PMSmechanics post at the end of page 1 is spot on.

First: To answer the "Why need more power" question.........alot of tasks with a tractor, traction ISNT the limiting factor. HP is. My 50HP tractor is physically big enough to pull a 15' batwing or bigger. Do I have the HP to run it....NO. Anyone who has bogged down a rotary cutter because they hit a dense patch in too high of a gear....understand what I am talking about. ANYTHING driven off the PTO could stand for some more HP. An average 3000# tractor these days has a ~2500# rear lift capacity and 40HP. So you want to run a tiller? Your limited by nothing other than HP. So, yes, I understand where the OP is coming from in "thinking" that tractors are underpowered.

Second: dynos dont actually measure HP. They measure torque and the computer calculates HP.
Now as to how its calculated, you are correct. Its done the same way. The dyno dont care about max, peak, continuous, etc. Thats a MFG and engineering thing.

You see, those 400hp+ engines in a pickup......thats a peak rating. Can they indeed make 400hp.....yup. Can they do it all day long.....nope.
So a tractor, that is designed for continuous use, needs to be governed. It needs to be "de-tuned" or (underpowered) down to the point where it can work all day long, and still last a lifetime. If tractors were unleashed, with no governing.....people would be blowing them up all the time.

So, while you "can in theory" make a tractor engine make about double its current HP.......It wouldnt be able to sustain it. Thus, they are regulated down to a power level that they CAN sustain all day long, AND still live a full life.

Yes, you are right, the higher the HP the shorter the life. But, if I were to re-flash the PCM in my 2555 and say get 85HP out of it, that would have very little if any impact on engine longevity.

Also, the Mahindra 2565 Shuttle Cab sells for $41,230, the 2555 Shuttle Cab sells for $36,680. They are the exact same tractor except for that 10 HP, which Mahindra makes you pay $4,550 for. Why should we pay over $4500 for a messily 10HP?

This is done across the board, all makes, all sizes of tractors. Its actually cheaper for the MFG to use a LARGE engine, just de-tune it a bit, and meet a lower HP point. Rather than casting a whole new engine block and associated parts. And yes, many times the next bigger HP model, has nothing dont to it other than different programming. Though sometimes there are some other slight differences to cooling system, or drivetrain to handle the extra power, but not always.

You ask why charge $4k+ more for it......simple economics. Supply and demand. They charge more because they can.

Look at johndeere 7x30 series. All have a 414.4 cu in 6-cylinder
7130.........125hp
7230.........135hp
7330.........150hp
7430.........166hp
7530.........180hp

Granted there are some other differences on those models as well. But in your example of the mahindra 2555 and 2655......does it cost mahindra the same amount of money to build each, probably, since its only a difference in computer programming. But if they sold the tractors for the same amount of money.....do you think they would ever sell any of the 2555's? They might as well not even have that model in their lineup. And to have a totally different engine design (rather than just de-tuning an engine) for every HP point they sell at.....would drive to cost of the tractors up across the board. The would have to stock lots more parts, etc.

So instead of looking at it like that extra 10hp costing $4500 being a rip-off. Think of it in terms of getting a really good deal on a 2555 by giving up 10hp.
 
   / Why are tractors so under-powered? #66  
HP is HP they are all tested/rated on the same type of dyno. I had never seen a dyno that test continuous horsepower.
First off, when the dyno test of a tractor is performed at full throttle, that is continuous HP for that engine since tractor engines are designed to run full throttle all day long 24/7 for years and years if needed. The same engine lets say at tractor HP is 100 HP might be rated for a different circumstance as in a truck or other industrial uses at much more HP and as such might be tweaked up to produce double the HP of its use on a tractor but you can bet that the engine isn't going to last as long producing 200 HP as it will running at 100. 30-50 years ago it was rare to find a tractor engine turning more than 1900 RPM but now some will run almost 3K and I doubt that you will see those engines still running 40-50 years from now like the old iron tractors of yester year are doing.


The Cummings 4BT and the 6BT are both sold for automotive and industrial use, i.e. genset, Isuzu does the same thing. The engines from the big three would last just as long in a tractor.
That is not entirely true. Big truck engines can go a million miles in many cases before overhaul. So @ 60 MPH that equates to a little over 16,000 hours at varying RPM but mostly at cruise speed of 60-75 MPH. If you took that automotive engine that routinely runs in a big truck at 1500 RPM cruising with the occasional rev to max RPM and revved it to max throttle full time, it isn't going to last as many years as a tractor engine that maxes out at 2000+ RPM full time. It is not uncommon for a tractor engine to last more than 15000 hours without any mechanical problems and that is running in adverse conditions of dust and grime compared to highway conditions of a large truck + most farm tractor hours are put on at full or near full load on the engine. Farmers have been know to boost the HP on their tractors by 25% or so, but in doing so, it cuts the life time proportionally. Life expectancy of an engine is determined by the RPM x HP rating / designed total RPM rating.

Just as the top fuel dragsters might pull 6000 HP @10,000 RPM out of their engine it only runs 4-5 seconds at that HP before having to be torn down and rebuilt. That equates to less than 1000 rotations of that engine. Take that same engine (minus all the HP boosters) and put it in a car and it would run for many years and miles.
 
   / Why are tractors so under-powered? #67  

The guy standing behind the tree and filming must have seen straps, tow ropes, hooks or such break before

Good thinking[/QUOTE]

Yes, there was some concern from all of us that something might give, most likely on the side of the car. That was the reason for the motorcycle helmet and jacket as well as the carry all in the raised position, as well as the guys filming from behind trees.
 
   / Why are tractors so under-powered? #68  
This is done across the board, all makes, all sizes of tractors. Its actually cheaper for the MFG to use a LARGE engine, just de-tune it a bit, and meet a lower HP point. Rather than casting a whole new engine block and associated parts. And yes, many times the next bigger HP model, has nothing dont to it other than different programming. Though sometimes there are some other slight differences to cooling system, or drivetrain to handle the extra power, but not always.

You ask why charge $4k+ more for it......simple economics. Supply and demand. They charge more because they can.

The exact same thing is done in computer systems. Having worked at a large blue computer mfg'er for many years, I can tell you that we would have several computer models for sale. The box was the same, but the performance varied a lot. They would do this by running the top model full out, the next model would have have 1 out of every 5 clock cycles do nothing for an 80% model, the 3rd model would have 2 of every 5 clocks do nothing for 60% and so on. Another technique would just be to slow down the clock itself.

A little off topic, but just for fun.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2011 Ford F-550 Iowa 1015 3,200LB Crane Mechanics Truck (A51692)
2011 Ford F-550...
Yale MPB040-EN24T2748 4,000lbs Electric Walk-Behind Pallet Jack (A51691)
Yale...
2012 VOLVO A40F 6X6 OFF ROAD DUMP TRUCK (A51246)
2012 VOLVO A40F...
2004 CATERPILLAR D6R XL CRAWLER DOZER (A51406)
2004 CATERPILLAR...
2022 DRAGON  130BBL VACUUM TRAILER (A53843)
2022 DRAGON...
2010 Ford Edge SE SUV (A51694)
2010 Ford Edge SE...
 
Top