Loren49
Platinum Member
Did anyone see this article in Aug/Sep 2014 Mother Earth News?
What I took from their response to a letter was Mother telling readers to lobby for pick-ups and the like to be regulated using the same rules and MPG restrictions as passenger cars.
I don't get it. Most of the advertisers in the magazine need a large vehicle to move their tractor, attachment or similar heavy equipment. Why would Mother encourage large price increases and performance decreases in the vehicles required for their advertisers to sell their products?
Is Mother moving so much into the urban market they are forgetting the homesteader and small farmer? Does their staff only write, so they don't know what it takes to farm?
Just don't get it.
Most readers of Mother Earth News do not farm for a living. It would be interesting to see data on the number of hours/minutes per year that truck owners haul cargo that wouldn't fit in a car. Trucks I observe carry a driver and a nearly empty box a high percentage of the time. A cost benefit analysis would show that for many truck owners paying for delivery when needed would make better financial sense. I ran a dairy farm for 5 years and my only vehicle was a VW bug. I paid for delivery occasionally and borrowed an uncles truck now and then. I also made a profit. Not many farmers transport tractors/equipment with their truck.
Currently I own a Toyota Corolla and a small trailer. It can carry up to 1500 lbs. though I seldom haul more than 500. When not needed (99% or time) I get 36 mpg or so.
Owning a truck is a choice for most and a Big One is another choice for most. There are some who can easily justify the truck for business reasons. I'm not criticizing truck owners but stating that for many its just what you want to drive.:thumbsup:
Loren