TresCrows
Elite Member
You can make numbers say what you want, politicians do it all the time. It realy is a poor fuel, hard on seals and rubber, lower MPG, lower performance overall and in the real world most of the energy imput to make the grain fuel is from petroleum since those tractors are not running on solar power but are running on diesel as are the plants that make the grain fuel from electricity generated mostly by petroleum but that is a small thing.
Another prediction, grain fuels will contribute an important part of our fuel --about 10 percent give or take----but they will be blended with petroleum which means we are still down a creek without a paddle. Row, row your SUV/truck/jumbo sized vehicle, merrily, merrily down the highway /forums/images/graemlins/frown.gif.
Now, if we could use nuke power--breeders--or when they get fusion going---everything changes. The energy ratios go out the window and ethanol and oil and hydrogen fuels would all benefit because the nuke power could produce our electricity, provide power for some of the refining and distilling processes and manufacturing processes. There are ways out of our predicament but we just don't like any of them, some for good reasons, some for hysterical reasons. J
Another prediction, grain fuels will contribute an important part of our fuel --about 10 percent give or take----but they will be blended with petroleum which means we are still down a creek without a paddle. Row, row your SUV/truck/jumbo sized vehicle, merrily, merrily down the highway /forums/images/graemlins/frown.gif.
Now, if we could use nuke power--breeders--or when they get fusion going---everything changes. The energy ratios go out the window and ethanol and oil and hydrogen fuels would all benefit because the nuke power could produce our electricity, provide power for some of the refining and distilling processes and manufacturing processes. There are ways out of our predicament but we just don't like any of them, some for good reasons, some for hysterical reasons. J