This will probably get me flamed, but the condensation issue is really over-exaggerated. Yes, it occurs. Although it doesn't help matters any, it also doesn't cause the majority of moisture issues you'll see inside a fuel tank.
On a boating forum I also frequent, one of the members was hawking a product he just put on the market that was designed to deal with this issue. He showed some photos of moisture that had been removed from some tanks and concluded that it was somehow *automatically* condensation that had occurred after the fuel was in the tanks. His invention was a device that closed off the fuel tank vent unless the engine was running.
His "data" included details about how much moisture had accumulated, how long it took, etc. I asked him if he'd done any real math, and he didn't know what I meant. I was referring, (of course), to how many times a fuel tank that size would need to "inhale", (via the vent), a volume of ambient air, then wring out every possible drop of moisture it could contain, then "exhale", (via the vent), that volume of air so it could inhale a fresh volume and repeat the process....over and over. Even when using worst-possible-scenario conditions of humidity, the math still didn't make sense. And even if you could envision a scenario in which there was enough moisture in the ambient air to produce the amount of "condensation" he was seeing, you still have to explain the fuel tank's necessary tendency to pull in outside air, wring out the moisture, and keep repeating the process over and over....in order to wind up with the amount of moisture he was attributing to condensation after the fuel was already in the tank. In the area of the country where he resided, he thought daily temperature swings of 20 or 30 degrees F were "extreme" somehow, but around here that's nothin'.
Does condensation in the tank occur? Sure it does. But the majority of stuff I own never sees 1/2 tank or more indicated on the fuel gauge. And yet I have less, (actually...none), of the "condensation problems" that a lot of other folks do.
Same thing applies to the stuff I see daily at work. One customer will have all sorts of moisture-related problems, while another one does not. Same weather, same ambient conditions, same tendency to operate the machinery with the fuel gauge closer to "empty" than "full", etc. If it were truly all attributable to condensation that occurred after the fuel was in the tanks we'd see much more consistent results form customer to customer than we do.
(I know this isn't an "ethanol thread", but the boating forum guy was also touting his product's *obvious* benefit because having a closed vent would also prevent E10 users from having to worry about their ethanol "sucking" moisture out of the ambient air. His math didn't add up there either though.)

On a boating forum I also frequent, one of the members was hawking a product he just put on the market that was designed to deal with this issue. He showed some photos of moisture that had been removed from some tanks and concluded that it was somehow *automatically* condensation that had occurred after the fuel was in the tanks. His invention was a device that closed off the fuel tank vent unless the engine was running.
His "data" included details about how much moisture had accumulated, how long it took, etc. I asked him if he'd done any real math, and he didn't know what I meant. I was referring, (of course), to how many times a fuel tank that size would need to "inhale", (via the vent), a volume of ambient air, then wring out every possible drop of moisture it could contain, then "exhale", (via the vent), that volume of air so it could inhale a fresh volume and repeat the process....over and over. Even when using worst-possible-scenario conditions of humidity, the math still didn't make sense. And even if you could envision a scenario in which there was enough moisture in the ambient air to produce the amount of "condensation" he was seeing, you still have to explain the fuel tank's necessary tendency to pull in outside air, wring out the moisture, and keep repeating the process over and over....in order to wind up with the amount of moisture he was attributing to condensation after the fuel was already in the tank. In the area of the country where he resided, he thought daily temperature swings of 20 or 30 degrees F were "extreme" somehow, but around here that's nothin'.
Does condensation in the tank occur? Sure it does. But the majority of stuff I own never sees 1/2 tank or more indicated on the fuel gauge. And yet I have less, (actually...none), of the "condensation problems" that a lot of other folks do.
Same thing applies to the stuff I see daily at work. One customer will have all sorts of moisture-related problems, while another one does not. Same weather, same ambient conditions, same tendency to operate the machinery with the fuel gauge closer to "empty" than "full", etc. If it were truly all attributable to condensation that occurred after the fuel was in the tanks we'd see much more consistent results form customer to customer than we do.
(I know this isn't an "ethanol thread", but the boating forum guy was also touting his product's *obvious* benefit because having a closed vent would also prevent E10 users from having to worry about their ethanol "sucking" moisture out of the ambient air. His math didn't add up there either though.)