grsthegreat
Super Star Member
Heres the link. I really like those couplers. Never seen that kind before.Hey grs,
if YOU had the video, could YOU post it to YouTube? I can email it to you....
Heres the link. I really like those couplers. Never seen that kind before.Hey grs,
if YOU had the video, could YOU post it to YouTube? I can email it to you....
Thanks for the tip. i did'nt not tought about that. Mine is a 2008 and the previus oner told me he had to change some hose because he broken them but I do not know witch one.Ipakiz, thanks for clueing me in. I wasn't aware; this forum generally does a great job at keeping things civil. (I see his post has been deleted, glad to see that.)
grasshopper, one thing you need to keep in mind: on my 2310, and I suspect a number of other M-F tractors, Massey-Ferguson very often makes things --wires, cables, hydraulic lines, etc.-- just as short as they can while still being able to do the job. If you cut off your couplers, your hose may well end up 1-2" too short to work with a new coupler fitting, making it necessary to replace the entire hose.
Some of those are long! If you end up replacing the hoses that are connected to both male and female couplers, that's a total of eight hoses, not a job I'd look forward to... though you would end up with new hoses, not necessarily a bad thing. I've had to replace three of my hoses so far -- a 2007 model purchased in 2008, now with a bit over 1000 hrs on it.
@ lpakiz These are in fact verry interesting.I don't think it's the same type as mine. But I'll try.Heres the link. I really like those couplers. Never seen that kind before.
I must have been thinking of the "connect under pressure" couplers when mentioning the increased price. I agree that using the collar for the mounting is basically the only difference in the breakaway setup.I wouldn't know about their cost, as they came standard on the tractor. I have bought extra male tips and they were not noticeably more expensive. And I suspect they are not much different than a "two-way collar" type. It's just that the collar is made to be the mounting point, simply reversing which component needs to move to hook or unhook.
As far as saving expense by "breaking away" they sure would and did, in the case of a plow hitch tripping when you hook a root or rock, or forgetting to disconnect them when unhooking an implement.
Alas, as soon as you put an elbow next to them, they won't unhook. The side torque puts them in a bind and they won't, at least until it bends the bracket enough to make the pull straighter, and I'm not sure even then, that they would unhook.
I can tell you that just to unhook them manually, you need to grasp them as close to the elbow as possible and usually I hold the hose part "in" with a little pressure, to counteract the side torque. The little hook I made helps to put the pull as close as possible to the centerline. I think a loop of wire, a shoelace, or zip strap could serve the same function, and even allow you to use a screwdriver, a short length of rod, or a sliver of wood for the tee-handle.
I figured I'd make a new thread other then my Float Thread. In my journey trying to disassemble my loader joystick. I can't disconnect my hydrolic. the collar will not slide up or down or turn.
Any idea ?
It's a 2008 and I don't think they have ever been disconnected before.