Personally I really like this thread, for the most part emotions have been left at the door and people are being objective. I almost posted last night but held off simply because I figured it would lead to some attacks.
I'll openly say that I have criticized many of the Kioti owners for pushing their brand when it is not appropriate, but I have a pretty solid record of suggesting it to be a good brand when it is appropriate. I do think that Noodlearm's observations are spot on accurate.
A former TBN member as actually been kicked off of TBN for his attacks when questioned about logic of some of his posts pushing Kioti. --Example, a guy specifically requested information on a tractor in the 40+hp range, and specifically stated he NEEDED both HST and a MMM. The Kioti guy pushed the DK45.
Another example, guy wants to mow the lawn on 2 acres, specifically wants a MMM. The very same Kioti guy pushed the CK30.
I used those examples simply because that guy ultimately got banned for some very offensive stuff. But there is no shortage of those examples scattered around.
There are some other issues that seem to bring up heated debate too. Price is obviously a hot button. Seems like when a legitimate poster can't save big money on a Kioti he is almost attacked and the implication is that he is a liar. Recently I asked if some of the price difference might have been simply bad negotiating skills of some buyers and was immediately attacked for even asking the question, but several Deere & Kubota owners jumped in and indicated that they didn't see any major price advantage to Kioti. And there are posts indicating Kioti to be more expensive than Kubota scattered around. But certainly the prevelant view is that Kioti is lower priced, but it is not close to a unanimous certanty. So again, that is an issue that will remain a hot topic for a long time to come.
I have posted previously on TBN and on other forums where this type of stuff is discussed if each brand has a different personality of buyer? I personally think it does. The initial post in this thread certainly touched on that very subject.
I've often likened Kubota owners to Toyota owners, they have something good, it is pretty vanilla in most ways, but it works and gets the job done and is reliable as all get out; owners of 30+hp units seem to have prior experience with tractors, below 30hp, most are on their first machine.
JD owners strike me as expecting a high level of quality, functionality and service; not unlike a Mercedes Benz; most seem to be VERY experienced with tractors.
The owners of New Hollands seem to favor specific advantages and appreciate the Swiss Army knife type versitility of their machines, and they put up with the occasional problems, not unlike VW owners, most seem to be VERY experienced with tractors, especially true in larger size machines.
Kioti owners seem to be first time owners in most machine sizes, they seem to be very price sensitive, and many seem to place a fairly low value on dealer service, often traveling 50+ miles to purchase their machine.
Obviously there are exceptions to my characterizations for every brand, these are my general impressions only.