Gear drive vs hydro

   / Gear drive vs hydro #151  
****, did i start on the wrong day?? i already drank myself sober.

jake
 
   / Gear drive vs hydro #152  
Mossroad,

If it was up to N80 I would be mowing turf accounts, moving pallets, lots of loader work on concrete, gravel, & dirt, bushhogging, and rarely if ever operating in mud using a gear tractor with R1 tires. :rolleyes:

Oh no, did I just introduce the R1 vs R4 saga into this thread as well.........:eek: :D
 
   / Gear drive vs hydro #153  
You and I have had this discussion before... you actually do ""real work"" with your machines and most of these folks do not. :p ;):)

I put double quotes around a healthy pet peeeve. what is real work, a fisherman would think it's another typo. Personally I think everything I do is on the real side. (other than typing gibberish late at nite here), that's just plain fun.

this is supposed to be about gear/hydro not how much can sombody afford or how far can i puff out my chest...

nobody answered yet if they have syncro on a CUT...

jake

what's up? you guys all trying out pandora.com? i can't hear you...
 
   / Gear drive vs hydro #154  
nobody answered yet if they have syncro on a CUT..jake
L2550, L3450 dont grind too much up or down -- close enuf. 7520 has it but will grind if you go down multiple gears in one step - can go f/r shuttle w/o stop. BX1500 grinds when shifting ranges if tractor is moving much. JD has synchro in each range - f/r in range w/o stop.
larry
 
   / Gear drive vs hydro #155  
Larry,

So you're saying yes? We can buy compact tractors and drive like Mario Andretti?
I didn't know syncro was an option on a CUT. Probably a good thing.

Jake
 
   / Gear drive vs hydro #156  
Larry,

So you're saying yes? We can buy compact tractors and drive like Mario Andretti?
I didn't know syncro was an option on a CUT. Probably a good thing.

Jake
;)-It may not be. The Kubs dont have it near as I can tell, but they dont grind ominously. The Mahindra doesnt sound or feel as harmless when it grinds so lucky its seldom due the synchro. I wont worry so much down the road after the edges of the teeth have gotten radiused by a lot of little grinds. Difficult to explain the distinction between ominous:eek: and practically harmless. Its an experience/feel sort of thing.
 
   / Gear drive vs hydro #157  
that's funny but i don't know w hat you're saying.. other than the grinding

are you guys doing the game tonight??? not funny to not invite me on the right nite.

jm
 
Last edited:
   / Gear drive vs hydro #158  

Not really. Remember this:

N80 said:
And while you may fire back some justification for that, and it might even be real and rational, that certainly won't be the case for 99.999% of us who also own tiny little tractors and spend more time arguing about their transmissions than using them. Right?

And virtually NO ONE here is talking about HST vs Gear when it comes to making a living.

And really, in all seriousness, if any of us valued family time that much, we probably wouldn't have these machines at all, they're hobbies. They don't pay the rent and we ride around on them for fun.

Yes, you will get more HP for your money with a gear tractor. But there comes a point where more HP is useless, like mowing a half an acre lawn with a 90 HP tractor and a 15' batwing mower. :rolleyes:

That's a meaningless analogy. Its called 'reductio ad absurdum' which means:

"a type of logical argument where one assumes a claim for the sake of argument and derives an absurd or ridiculous outcome, and then concludes that the original claim must have been wrong as it led to an absurd result."

The point being, there comes a point where any feature of a tractor can be useless. Its not limited to HP, gears, tires or otherwise.

Get out there and put some machines through their paces. That's the only way you can become a witness. Everything you say about an HST is hearsay. Book smart Vs actual, real life experience. :rolleyes:

This is a specious claim. As I've mentioned before, only a moron needs to lick the frozen flag pole to prove for himself that his tongue will stick to it. Besides, dude, everything I say about HST...I learned from you and a few others here! Does that mean its still hearsay. No? Then why not?
 
   / Gear drive vs hydro #159  
Thanks! :) So there's a chart around the edge of the tach with different rings for different gears for different RPMS? Anyone got a picture of that. Sounds interesting.

That's the way my B-I-L's John Deeres are. They are older tractors though. I think, but don't remember for sure, that his Case-O-Matics have the same thing. Nice feature and seems like it ought to be included on pretty much any simple tractor.
 
   / Gear drive vs hydro #160  
N80,

Your points on pulling a 2 bottom or what ever in "just barely" mode with a gear tractor and not able to with an HST is fallacious. There are 3 HP's that are important with tractors, as you know. (I'm adding this for those that are less knowledgeable). There is the engine HP and that's self explanatory. There is the PTO HP that is available for the PTO. But, there is also the drawbar HP. That's the load that can be pulled. It's a function of tire design, weight and 3pt design geometry. An L4400 FST, GST and HST will all be too close to distinguish in drawbar hp with the same tires, balance and geometry of all are practically identical. If anything, the HST may be able to pull a bottom plow better than a FST as the forward speed can be more easily modulated, but that would be speculation. I know I can pull a 2x14 bottom plow with a L3410 hst thru sod bound soil that hasn't seen tillage in 20+ years. With 99% probability a L3410 FST would not be able to pull a 3x14. I doubt that an L4400 would pull a 3x14, but it may. But it would take at least a 15 hp jump to pull an extra bottom and to get that hp gain, it's more than the typical cost difference gear to hst.

Maybe I do more loader work than most. Dunno. But I feel more is done in less time with the smaller hst tractor, and it's on the order of hours per day and not fractional minutes when there is a job exceeding a day's length. Typically with BH work, I use the old ford to dig the dirt, but the Kubota to move it. That gets the dirt moved faster for me.

Jake98 - Kubota FST is a gear trans, the letters stand for Fully Syncronized Transmission. Can't speak for the others, some are and some aren't. As far as driving like Mario Andretti, well only Mario and maybe his son Micheal fit that bill!

Mossroad - look up a picture of a proofmeter for a ford 801. Specifically a 841 or a 851/861.
http://www.ytmag.com/store/parts/pics/wm_S.67644.jpg

jb
 
Last edited:

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2000 Safari C-Series 425 40ft Panther Motorhome (A52377)
2000 Safari...
2025 IR UNUSED Hydraulic Breaker (A53117)
2025 IR UNUSED...
2012 Acura TL Sedan (A51694)
2012 Acura TL...
2024 JOHN DEERE 8R 280 LOT NUMBER 8 (A53084)
2024 JOHN DEERE 8R...
John Deere 4650 Tractor (A53117)
John Deere 4650...
2010 Ford Edge SE SUV (A51694)
2010 Ford Edge SE...
 
Top