There is a few problems with your history report. When Kubota came into the US their products where perceived as being over priced. The reason Kubota was successful was that they where selling a product line that the domestic companies did not think had a real market potential here in the US. They where not popular because they where cheap, it was because they where innovative. There is a long history of failed tractor companies who sold on price alone.
Perceived as being overpriced? When they first came out? I think they've always been overpriced.
Maybe they were also overpriced when they first came out; but Deere has ruled the nest, where I live, for a long time. They also, still to this day, cost more than Kubota; but not by very much. Those who own Kubota's, where I live, will also tell you that Kubota's not only better than Deere; but also cheaper. I told them they needed to check the current prices, rather than just trade-in for a bigger tractor; or better yet - look at another maker, such as Kioti.
But, No! They just keep climbing the ladder you guys built. Sometimes the trade in value will make you think you're getting a better deal. It's that old car salesman gimmick. Deja Vu!
By the way. Speaking of car dealers, and checking your history, maybe you should check the history of Chrysler, and G.M. Can you say Bankrupt?