Bridge#2

   / Bridge#2 #161  
This has been very intersting, and infomative. Still, I think that there is a chance that the very best, safest, and cost effective bridges are built on the keyboard, and not across streams, or gullies. As the very wealthy guy I worked for said now, and then. This is how I made my first million, show me yours, and we will talk about it. :D
 
   / Bridge#2 #162  
No ego bruised here either, but I didn't trot out my qualifications..i.e. all the successful business ventures, hours spent toiling at engineering and business classes..

Nope, my ego isn't bruised! I spent an entire career actually building what the college boys dreamed up.. Where the rubber meets the road. And, I could always tell a smart engineer from one less so.. The smart ones would listen to, and heed my advice and design changes.. The less than smart ones?? Well, they were great also! I got a lot of overtime making things they designed anew, after they could finally see it wouldn't work..

Yup, I made a lot of "time and a half" because of engineers that always knew better.. LOL

I've had the pleasure of working both sides of the fence, I apprenticed at GM ( yes, carried a union card) and worked the floor before I decided to go back to college for engineering. I got to make the stuff first then learn why later. My first college adventure was to be a High School Voc Ed. teacher in machine tool and welding. When I found out how little teachers made in 1977 I took the GM apprenticeship instead of teaching.

I was the same person when I was in skilled trades as I was as an engineer, no better or worse then anyone else, just had a different job to do.

I've worked with smart engineers and smart toolmakers, (and some pretty dumb, arrogant ones) the best ones had respect for others opinions and tried to incorporate the best ideas regardless where they came from.
 
   / Bridge#2 #163  
I've had the pleasure of working both sides of the fence, I apprenticed at GM ( yes, carried a union card) and worked the floor before I decided to go back to college for engineering. I got to make the stuff first then learn why later. My first college adventure was to be a High School Voc Ed. teacher in machine tool and welding. When I found out how little teachers made in 1977 I took the GM apprenticeship instead of teaching.

I was the same person when I was in skilled trades as I was as an engineer, no better or worse then anyone else, just had a different job to do.

I've worked with smart engineers and smart toolmakers, (and some pretty dumb, arrogant ones) the best ones had respect for others opinions and tried to incorporate the best ideas regardless where they came from.


I don't come here to argue or blow my own horn. I come to view great projects like buggyman produced here. I'd like to not detract from his hard work and craftsmanship..

This thread is about he and his bridge.. not folks who wish to detract from it

I'll bow out so as not to provoke this side discussion any further..

Those who wish to argue can get me through the PM function.
 
   / Bridge#2
  • Thread Starter
#164  
Uh...lets play nice guys...lol, not sure how planes got on my bridge... but...anyhow.. I would like to thank all of you for your interest and help, and idea's. I've learned a lot from everyone on this board. Transit was (is) my biggest critic, but I value his posts as well. When I look back at what everyone's wrote about the bridge's i've built, i'm impressed at the brainpower you guys have...every idea anyone came up with was good, well thought out, and I learned from every single one of them. I would like to state that both bridges will mostly be used as footbridges, with crossing's with the tractor as needed. I alone will do this (cross with anything heavy). I look foward to everyone's input and help on my future projects. Thanks again...buggyman1..aka..bridgeman1.....
 
   / Bridge#2 #165  
Uh...lets play nice guys...lol, not sure how planes got on my bridge... but...anyhow.. I would like to thank all of you for your interest and help, and idea's. I've learned a lot from everyone on this board. Transit was (is) my biggest critic, but I value his posts as well. When I look back at what everyone's wrote about the bridge's i've built, i'm impressed at the brainpower you guys have...every idea anyone came up with was good, well thought out, and I learned from every single one of them. I would like to state that both bridges will mostly be used as footbridges, with crossing's with the tractor as needed. I alone will do this (cross with anything heavy). I look foward to everyone's input and help on my future projects. Thanks again...buggyman1..aka..bridgeman1.....

I think you have a fine bridge design, I'm impressed not only with your building skill but also with your structural steel handling skills, those are big beams to get in place without a crane.

Don't know where you are in Kentucky but I have brother that lives down by Scottsville. Very pretty country down there.
 
   / Bridge#2 #166  
My only problem with this project is that I wish you had built it and posted about it before I built my bridge. I'm sure all bridge projects are different but there are some ideas you had that I could have used in my project. Nice job.
 
   / Bridge#2 #167  
Bridgeman1, AKA Buggyman1,:D

I've enjoyed both threads and do hope these will not detere(sp?) you from posting your other projects as well. I've enjoyed the spirited babble, technical talk and basic BS. BTW, you engineers, what does thermo dynamics and stress analysis have to do with driving a train anyway?:eek::D

Jay
 
   / Bridge#2 #168  
Bridgeman1, AKA Buggyman1,:D

....... I've enjoyed the spirited babble, technical talk and basic BS. BTW, you engineers, what does thermo dynamics and stress analysis have to do with driving a train anyway?:eek::D

Jay


Well obviously, thermodynamics is related to the steam, and stress analysis is related to the strength of the boiler! :D

.
 
   / Bridge#2 #169  
Well obviously, thermodynamics is related to the steam, and stress analysis is related to the strength of the boiler! :D

.

Remember jayste, you asked. Danno1, your answer is correct; however it doesn't scratch the surface.
Let's take Thermo Dynamics as it applies to trains. The Ideal Gas law; PV=nTR or rewritten as PV/T=nR where nR is a constant and may be written for two conditions [1] and [2] P1V1/T1 = P2V2/T2. Ok, now what? Do you have an Air Compressor? Air enters the compressor at state 1, Pressure 1, Volume 1, and Temperature 1. When the piston moves to the top of its stroke the pressure is P2, volume is V2 at temperature T2. P2 will be greater than P1, T2>T1 and V1>V2. The ratio must be satisfied and predicts the values of P, T, and V of condition 2 starting from condition 1. So now you know why your compressor gets hot. I can't write the mathematical expression with this format in word, but here is a problem that relates to our discussion.

Ten lbs. of air is compressed from 14.696 psi atmospheric and 60 deg F to 60 psi gauge when the barometer is 14.696 psi atmospheric. Find the horsepower to drive the compressor.

a) the initial volume of ten pounds of air is calculated from the Ideal Gas Law;
b) V1= 10 lb. x 53.35 ft-lb/lb R x [60 +460] R / [ 12in x 12 in x 14.696 psf]= 131.0 cubic feet of air. Adding 460 converts the temperature to absolute or Rankin temperature
c) The final pressure is P2= 14.696 + 60 = 74.696 psi absolute. Adding 14.696 converts gauge pressure to absolute pressure.
d) The final volume V2= 10 lb. x 53.35 ft-lb/lb R x [60 +460] R / [ 12in x 12 in x 74.696 psf]= 25.8 cubic feet of air.
e) The Work to run the compressor is P1V1 log V2/V1 or 14.696 x 12 x 12 x 131 x log 28.8/131.0 = - 450,000 ft-lb of work.
f) Hp = work/ 33,000 = -450,000/33,000 or 13.6 hp to run the compressor.

Now this is using the Ideal Gas Law, there are other expressions that are more accurate and more complex.
This is also the fundamental beginnings of other thermal processes, Diesel Cycle, Otto Cycle, jet Cycle.
The nR is the stuff that is the working fluid [air], R is the constant that relates to that fluid, Air is 53.35, steam 85.81, co2 35.13.
N is the number of molecules in the fluid. However it is not that simple, when you have a chemical reaction, combustion than n is a chemical term, moles and much more complex.

So now what do we do with all this compressed air? Air Breaks, in a train yard it's used to move Switch Tracks. Internal combustion engines lose Hp as they gain altutide, at 7,500 feet only 75% hp is available relative to see level. How to get it back? Turbocharger the engine.

Stress Analysis; that is simple too, it pertains to every component in the train that must carry a load or resist a force.
Let's take an axel. The axle must support the weight of the car or engine. Lets say the shear force to fail the axel is 120,000 psi of the cross sectional area of the axel. An axel 10 inches in diameter is 78.5 sq in. 120,000 x 78.5 =9,420,000 lb. or 4710 tons. That's over simplified because 1) there is no safety factor and 2) every half turn of the axel the applied force changes direction. Use a safety factor of 10 and the maximum load is 4710/10 or 470 tons. Take into account spinning the axel and reversing the load and we need to de-rate the load again by 10, now the maximum load is 47 tons. Need to carry more load? Use more axles. BTW, where does the axel load end up? On the rail, more stress, and then where? The track ties and the ground/ballast.

Hope that gives you more insight to the problems.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2022 Case IH Steiger 470HD AFS Connect RowTrac 4WD Tractor (A50657)
2022 Case IH...
2018 COLOMBO TM LOT NUMBER 184 (A53084)
2018 COLOMBO TM...
2013 KENWORTH T370 DUMP TRUCK (A51406)
2013 KENWORTH T370...
2012 SULLIVAN PALATEK AIR COMPRESSOR (A52576)
2012 SULLIVAN...
2010 Ford Edge SE SUV (A51694)
2010 Ford Edge SE...
2015 INTERNATIONAL MA025 (A52472)
2015 INTERNATIONAL...
 
Top