ROLL BACK VS this

   / ROLL BACK VS this #1  

LBrown59

Super Star Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2004
Messages
16,831
Location
First organized permanent settlement in the northw
Tractor
2003 Kubota BX1500/2004 Kubota Bx23/2005 Kubota BX1500
ROLL BACK VS this

IMG_0784.jpg


IMG_0777.jpg


Which one would you rather have to haul your tractor on and why ?
 
   / ROLL BACK VS this #2  
This is fine except you lose the tee bar option to tow something off the back.
 
   / ROLL BACK VS this #3  
Rollback


Much better loading angle.
Ability to tow a second vehicle (when properly equipped).
Ability to unload disabled or damaged vehicles that don't roll (whole bed tilts up).

I could go on and on about all around versatility, but if all you want to do is move your tractor a few times a year, either will do. The tilting tail will be cheaper and be easier to maintain with less moving parts/ hydraulics.
 
   / ROLL BACK VS this #4  
roll back will be cheaper and will be easier to find parts for.

Aaron Z
 
   / ROLL BACK VS this
  • Thread Starter
#5  
Rollback


Much better loading angle.
Ability to tow a second vehicle (when properly equipped).
Ability to unload disabled or damaged vehicles that don't roll (whole bed tilts up).

I could go on and on about all around versatility, but if all you want to do is move your tractor a few times a year, either will do. The tilting tail will be cheaper and be easier to maintain with less moving parts/ hydraulics.

roll back will be cheaper and will be easier to find parts for.

Aaron Z
I'm thinking it would be easier less complicated and less expensive to add a dump feature to the flat bed than it would be to add such a feature to the roll back.
 
   / ROLL BACK VS this #6  
Brown why are you going to purchase something.Or just stir the up a talk about neat truck you seen?
 
   / ROLL BACK VS this #7  
For a tractor like that, utility trailer behind my Toyota. Save the extra $$ for a bigger tractor and rollback :D JMO
 
   / ROLL BACK VS this #8  
Rollback is fine for a smaller machine. Back when I had my 2090 Case which was just under ten feet tall, I deferred to the driver to put that puppy on the rollback the couple of times that I needed to have it hauled for service.

Oh', I would have loaded it had I needed to. Been there done that on other applications but why take a chance when the expert was around.

They had "pockets" ie; wheelwells up front to minimize the overall heighth. That meant backing it up with a rather high reverse gear ratio. The rear axle would accomodate duals but I ran singles all the way out for stability on the hills. The tires overhung the side of the rollback.

It's a case of what works and feels the best for you. For the cost of a rollback, I can buy a decent truck and a trailer that will give me a lot more useage.
 
   / ROLL BACK VS this #9  
I'm thinking it would be easier less complicated and less expensive to add a dump feature to the flat bed than it would be to add such a feature to the roll back.

A modern rollback tilts plenty steep enough to slide a damaged vehicle off....... no need to 'add' a dump feature.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2018 Toro Grounds Master 7200 72in Zero Turn Commercial Mower (A50324)
2018 Toro Grounds...
90018 (A48082)
90018 (A48082)
2013 John Deere 544K Articulated Wheel Loader (A50322)
2013 John Deere...
2013 MACK GU713 (A50854)
2013 MACK GU713...
2015 MACK GU713 WINCH TRUCK (INOPERABLE) (A50854)
2015 MACK GU713...
PLEASE VIEW ALL PICTURES!! (A50775)
PLEASE VIEW ALL...
 
Top