taborekle
Gold Member
I'm part of a small HOA (15 lots) where one lot is owned by the guy who built the sub-division. This guy gave himself 6 votes as compared to everybody else's 1 vote. If he had done it legally, in a real meeting, there wouldn't be a problem.
But I'm not out for revenge on the builder. I'm out for revenge on one of the other owners that said they would pitch in for lawyer fees when we ("we" being the owners other than the builder) investigated the builder. Then after the secret meeting discussing what the lawyer found out, this ONE owner decided they didn't want to pitch in and left me to pick up their share of the bill.
Last year I was hired by the HOA to use my tractor to plow the road (1/2 mile or so). Being a nice guy, I cleared out the end of each drive way and if there were large drifts I'd get them too. So this year, everybody but ONE will get their drive way cleared. Too bad too, because that ONE is the longest drive with the tallest drifts. And I KNOW they don't have a snow blower.I'll be sure to smile and wave on my way past too.
![]()
It's unlikely that he's going to see this as a "oh I made a mistake, I guess I better repair that bridge" but rather as a "I'll get that guy (you) for this". So before you go nuclear, just make sure that you don't need him for anything.
It looks like the HOA is going to be the battlefield for this little war. You want to make sure that you're the popular member of the HOA and that the other people side with you in you're future disagreements with him. IE, he will likely try to get the HOA snowplowing contract moved to someone else in future years, so you will need the other members support to keep that from happening.
Being popular in groups is having power. Crossing people in groups that you have to operate in is to remove you're own future support. This is exactly why the HO decision to shaft you on the bill was the stupidist move he could have made.
Larry