Yes it is rationing, By price.
The only fair way to apportion "scarce resources, with alternative uses"
And if you are referring to VA coverage as "socialized" I will disagree with you. A number of people who served in Viet Nam with me and others wars, have left body parts and more in sort of a "pay in forward" plan
Well Gee,
America.
I really find it interesting that you use the Phrase "Glorious places of Learning" Ask Prokop is they were "Glorious places of Learning"And if they enjoyed "freedom" relative or not.
And yes, it will take years if not decades of rebuilding from the nightmare that is Socialism.
What we need in this country are more "czars" not answerable to anyone other then the president, and who are fond of Mao.
Shameless, I think not, what I would is say is that I am proud, to be an American. You?
A little different spin this morning. WHAT ABOUT AIGThey're going to give a 100million in bonus when they still how 124 billion{blows the mind} Maybe they should be in charge of medical, they seem to know how to screw the majority over
![]()
You just can't get away from the fundemental fact that other developed economies typically spend half what we do, provide universal coverage and have equal or better outcomes.
This is not some big mystery boys....
On the cost side these systems typically have not-for-profit insurance administration, lower cost providers, employ systems to track patient care and they use comparative effectiveness research to guide patient treatment.
And while I'm at it...the VHA...a completely government controlled, government run healthcare system, by most independent measures, has provided better care at lower cost than private institutions for at least the past decade. Look it up.
This is a political problem for the US. It has very little to do with what works.
In the mean time we're going broke.
MikePA- The "annual to monthly" was is a new sound byte -what does it mean. Here is a resource that analyses the causes of the deficit. Was there a reason we went from surplus to deficit under Bush (9/11 and wars and tax breaks for the rich) Has there been a little breakdown in our economy that has required extra government spending?(remember the Bush Administration )
A Few Facts:
Time for some reality checks.
Myth. Our national debt doubled in the last eight years.
Fact. Nope, no matter how you measure it. In fact, if adjusted for inflation, real economic growth and population growth, it didn't budge at all.
Here are the national debt figures in 2000 (President Clinton's last full year) and as currently estimated for 2008 (President Bush's last full year), as provided by our government.
2000 2008 % Increase
Total Debt (dollars) $5,628.7B $9,654.4B 72%
Held by Public ($) $3,409.8B $5,428.6B 59%
Total Debt (%GDP) 58.0% 67.5% 16%
Held by Public (%GDP) 35.1% 37.9% 8%
American Thinker: Who Are the Big Spenders?
I believe that President Obama addressed that claim (yearly to monthly deficit)at a town hall meeting (or was it when he took questions from the other party) It was the broadcast that Fox News covered for a little while but went to regular programing when the President continued to look too good. (CNN and MSNBC covered the complete exchange) This was a grilling by the minority party. Seems like it would be part of a "fair and balanced" report.
FallbrockFarmer: I don't believe there is evidence to support you gas price - healthcare connection. The best way to encourage conscientious use of gasoline (and other fuels) is to price them at there true cost and if you want to encourage conservation then tack on a few taxes. (for needed infrastructure so we pay the costs of transportation up front) The US pricing system hides much of the fuel costs in fed taxes and deficits. If our costs at the pump where closer to the real cost we would have much more energy efficient homes, cars, and businesses. This does not mean lower standard of living. You only pay for improvements in energy efficiency once and enjoy the reduced fuels needs for a long time. I believe that a Government that was not pressured by energy lobbyists would take care of this.
National energy pricing is not directly related to health care policy. From the research I have done there is no country where the whole cost of healthcare is covered by a public plan. There is a private insurance and out of pocket portion. I referenced the a good site to show this earlier.
I know some feel that the World Health Organization doesn't matter but here is their analyses of or system
Rank Country
1 France
2 Italy
3 San Marino
4 Andorra
5 Malta
6 Singapore
7 Spain
8 Oman
9 Austria
10 Japan
11 Norway
12 Portugal
13 Monaco
14 Greece
15 Iceland
16 Luxembourg
17 Netherlands
18 United Kingdom
19 Ireland
20 Switzerland
21 Belgium
22 Colombia
23 Sweden
24 Cyprus
25 Germany
26 Saudi Arabia
27 United Arab Emirates
28 ******
29 Morocco
30 Canada
31 Finland
32 Australia
33 Chile
34 Denmark
35 Dominica
36 Costa Rica
37 United States of America
38 Slovenia
39 Cuba
40 Brunei
We can do better,
Loren
Good Morning,
Did you note I said 'used to be glorious places of learning'. I am sure Prokop knows the history of his native country before the **** invasion and pre-communism (1948-1989). What is now the Czech Rep. has a very turbulent history going back to the beginning of the second millenium.
Still, the capital cities of Central Europe such as Prague were historically great cultural centers. They may return to their former status.
From wikipedia:
Situated on the Vltava River in central Bohemia, Prague has been the political, cultural and economic centre of the Czech state for more than 1100 years. For many decades during the Gothic and Renaissance eras, Prague was the permanent seat of two Holy Roman Emperors and thus was also the capital of the Holy Roman Empire.
Also proud to be an American, eventhough millions of my countrymen think Budweiser is actually beerI am obligated to defend their rights to drink it.
It is disengenuous however, to compare the healthcare of a late-stage communist country to anything we are discussing. I know you like the word 'socialism', but perhaps I should stick to 'universal' healthcare to make the distinction, semantically at least. There are many socialized aspects of how we provide and pay for US healthcare already. We do have, and have had for many years, publically supported/funded universities that provide doctor and nurse training. Is that socialized medicine?
Dave.
I will give you only one example to prove my point.
In 1913 when the income tax was instituted, only a few millionaires paid any tax, and the form was a single page. Do I have to say any more?
And yes, I do feel that it is a national shame that anything
coming out of a certain brewery in St. Louis is actually called beer.