milkman
Elite Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2001
- Messages
- 3,555
- Tractor
- BX2200, BCS 735
Logic just eludes some people.:confused2:
The top priorty priority of ballast is to counter rollover risk.In my mind its because as you put weight on the loader it will tend to lighten the rear tires and since the front tires will dig in it will reduce traction. Or is it due to a roll over risk if you try to lift something too heavy up front? Just wondering because I am planning to get a 2360BX and just didn't know how much loader work you can do without ballast and what the ballast is trying to prevent
1*Even a ground hog hole can cause a roll over even on flat land level land.1*It only takes a small bump or off camber situation to make you feel like you are going to tip over (sideways).
I keep my back hoe on my unit, and it is very good ballast. A box blade can do the same, especially if you add some weight to it.
2*I don't like ballast boxes because that is all they do, add weight. You can get that weight with other attachments that are actually tools serving a purpose.
1*Not the way to go.1*I have used FEL sans ballast, but do not recommend it.
2*As to the second part, my preference is for a four foot on a BX.
Beyond stability, rear (3ph) ballast when using the FEL avoids overloading the front axle.
If the front axle is overloaded, then the FEL is being used far beyond its rated load capacity (ballast or no ballast).
Well the balancing load is behind the rear axle. If you take a toy car (I just happen to have one on my deskand push down on it's rear bumper behind the rear axle the front wheels come up into the air. The weight is lifted off the front axle. Same principle with the three point hitch weight I believe.
Well the balancing load is behind the rear axle. If you take a toy car (I just happen to have one on my deskand push down on it's rear bumper behind the rear axle the front wheels come up into the air. The weight is lifted off the front axle. Same principle with the three point hitch weight I believe.