I work in the health care field, paramedic. We, the tax payers and health insurance owners, have been paying for what this bill will cover all along. Do you think the 34 million folks that will now have to get health insurance never got sick before? They did. They would just go to the ER where they would be treated, then either forgo there medical bills or make payments. So to cover these costs and also the lost revenue from medicare, hospitals raise the cost of health care to the individuals with health insurance.
What this bill does for individuals that currently have health insurance is hopefully lower the increases in our health insurance premiums. It does this by adding 34 million paying customers to the health care pool. Now many of the 34 million uninsured are the healthy young people that have never been sick, so in the past they have not gotten health insurance. Problem is they eventually get sick or injured and incur medical bills that they are unable to pay. For those that say it is unconstitutional to force these individuals to purchase health insurance I offer these two thoughts. Governments have forced individuals to purchase services they don't necessarily want or use since the inception of governing, this is called taxes. Also in many states the government has forced drivers to purchase car insurance if they want to drive.
The bill also insures everyone, regardless of past medical history, the inability for health insurers to deny you coverage or drop you from your current plan. This came too late for a pt I had that had passed out in her bathroom from severe dehydration. She was battling her third bout with cancer. She was a successful business women when she got cancer the first time and her insurance company dropped her. Since then she lost her house, her car and many of her personal belongings had to be sold to pay medical bills. Currently she was living above the garage of a friend. Even though she had no clue how she was going to pay for this trip to the hospital, she was still trying to smile.
Although not perfect, we need to give this health care bill a chance. America needs this.
OK. I tried to let this pass. Please, forgive me in advance.
I truly don't look to offend or cross into politics. I think I did OK keeping out more than just generalizations about politics. And yes, some of this is oversimplifying things, but the point is made...
I work in the health care field, paramedic. We, the tax payers and health insurance owners, have been paying for what this bill will cover all along. Do you think the 34 million folks that will now have to get health insurance never got sick before? They did.
I also work in the healthcare field. I have some insight into the current healthcare bill. In all honesty, I have not read through the monstrous collection of legalese that is our new healthcare bill. In fact, I would propose that most of us haven't. Legislators from both sides of the aisle have been cornered into admitting they have some, let me paraphrase, "incomplete information" on all the details therein.
Governments are like people. I never seen on that's perfect, including when I look in the mirror. With this particular bill, I fear, as others have posted, government will have as much success with this as it typically does with most things better left to the market. How successful do you believe the government has been with Amtrak? The Post Office? Social Security?
Unless I am misreading your intention, you contradict yourself. In the first paragraph,you question
"Do you think the 34 million folks that will now have to get health insurance never got sick before? They did". In the second, you imply that most of these newly insured are
"healthy young people that have never been sick". That's a bit like having your cake and eating it too.
Problem is they eventually get sick or injured and incur medical bills that they are unable to pay. They would just go to the ER where they would be treated, then either forgo there medical bills or make payments.
I speak from personal experience that making payments on medical bills is not fun. Been there and done that. Never did I think I could "forgo" paying my medical bills. My bills, my responsibility. Make payments on healthcare? Great! My health is way more valuable to me that anything else I have ever made payments on. If I buy the services of anyone else, be they plumber, accountant, or automobile mechanic, am I entitled to "forgo" payment to them if I don't have the cash? But healthcare is different, some say. Why? Without the plumber, my house would flood and I wouldn't have decent shelter. I NEED it. Therefore, if I feel I can't afford to pay him after the job's done, so be it. If I can't pay the mechanic after my car's fixed, tough luck. I NEED it to get back and forth to work. I can't figure my way through all the tax laws by myself, I NEED the accountant to do it for me, even if I can't pay for it.
For those that say it is unconstitutional to force these individuals to purchase health insurance I offer these two thoughts.
I would expound a bit more on the constitutionality of forcing something like healthcare onto citizens who would otherwise choose not to have it, but I suspect this would cross the "no politics" line our moderators ask us to oblige.
Also in many states the government has forced drivers to purchase car insurance if they want to drive.
If someone does not pay for his/her own healthcare, then they own all that goes with that. If someone injures another without the means to duly compensate them, there is a difference.
Governments have forced individuals to purchase services they don't necessarily want or use since the inception of governing, this is called taxes.
According to what I have seen in the Constuition and Bill of Rights, this government is intended to provide for the common defense, and for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. (Before anyone writes, yes there are other things, but you get my drift). There are reasons for any tax or program. But are they the right reasons?
She was battling her third bout with cancer...
No one wants to see someone's grandmother be denied care. Or little children. There are always "I know this guy..." stories that both sides use. There IS ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT in our current system. And I've seen some of the rankings by the World Health Organization and others that say the US healthcare is on par with, I don't know, Paraguay or some such. If you watch the news, however, three or four times a year you will catch a blurb about some sheik or other foreign dignitary that can choose basically anywhere on the planet for care, but where did they end up? Must be something good here. I don't think anyone should be denied emergent health care. There are programs already in existence to help with those costs, just ask anyone in hospital admissions.
Although not perfect, we need to give this health care bill a chance. America needs this.
I would like (if it doesn't displease the moderators) to see more of our friends on TBN from other countries weigh in on rationing healthcare and the other malfunctions we hear of from other places...
While lip-service was given to other needed changes like tort reform (have you SEEN what doctors have to pay for malpractice?), I don't know that any such changes were ever included.
And for anyone who believes the line about this program being "budget neutral" and/or not dramatically increasing the burden on the taxpayer to the tune of billions, let me tell you about this oceanfront time share condo I have in KY...
