clemsonfor
Super Member
As to the OP the EPA is testing to see if 15% ethanol will burn OK in engines. The results are due maybe by the end of the month. From what I remember they said it looks good, a hint that the gov may push it from 10% to 15% soon.
There was a place that sold the good old MTBE gas but about a week or so ago they said they couldn't get it any more. I suspect that non ethanol gas will get hard to find soon. I have yet to see a car that doesn't loose 10% fuel economy burning 10%. I don't understand how anyone in their right mind could honestly say burning the same amount of gas and burning 10% ethanol for no reason is better than the ground contamination MTBE causes. Once you figure in all the fuel used by the farmers, the fuel used in the fertilizer, the water needed to make ethanol, etc is just doesn't make sense.
I can understand a flex fuel car that can burn up to 85% ethanol but I have yet to see one pump in this state that has it, hardly worth buying a car that forces you to drive to the next state to take advantage of the "flex".
As far as small engines go I think this is a government trick to force you into replacing those old engines. The newer ones have catalytic converters in them.
My work truck is flex fuel will burn e85. I fill it up (not my $$) with ethonol when i can, 2 full fill ups and one half. The last time i filled it (4x4 dodge dakota quad cab) i got around 10 mpg or 44% less mpg. I paid $1.39 at that time for the e85. The crazy thing is i drove past several stations with e10 gas for the same price just to get the e85 to test. If it was my money i would not buy the stuff when fuel is higher its only like 25% cheaper anyway. Luckily i can still buy real 93 octane around here at certain stations, its only .20/gallon more than the e10 85 octane.