Kernopelli
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2006
- Messages
- 2,209
- Location
- Carterville, Illinois
- Tractor
- Mitsubishi MTE2000D, Dig It 258 Mini Ex, Deere Z930A ZTR
I definitely think a small cylinder would be fine as well as far as load is concerned. My thought is that you would want something with constant tension that allows for both belt stretch and shock. I think the hydraulics are going to provide a static tension which will work but I have a feeling that the belts will respond better to something with some give to them.....could be wrong, I usually am.:thumbsup: I think without some give, you are running the risk of accelerating the stretching of the belt. That's where I thought pneumatics would have the upper hand over hydraulics if using the belts, its ability to compress and rebound. The belts may be a whole lot tougher than I'm giving them credit for though, I'm not familiar with them.
I am a off road motorcycle guy though and I know how much a chain can stretch in a short time and it's hard to believe that some of the same principle wouldn't transfer over to the belts. After a while, it's not just an issue of constant retensioning, it's an issue of your sprockets and chain no longer being the same pitch. That's a big issue here.
I am a off road motorcycle guy though and I know how much a chain can stretch in a short time and it's hard to believe that some of the same principle wouldn't transfer over to the belts. After a while, it's not just an issue of constant retensioning, it's an issue of your sprockets and chain no longer being the same pitch. That's a big issue here.