mike69440
Elite Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2005
- Messages
- 3,303
- Location
- Central NH (God's Country)
- Tractor
- 2005 L39 Kubota, 2020 Polaris 570 Sportsman, 2006 RTV 900, 2019 RTV1100C, 1997 Komatsu PC75UU2E w/ Thumb & Blade, 2013 Mahindra Max28XL Shuttle plus many attachments
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( </font><font color="blueclass=small">(
The 110 is more machine that the L39, I believe Kubota is fibbing on the specs, especially the loader curl force, but again you can buy a real commercial unit for that money.)</font>
Kubota does not "fib" on their specs. If they where dumb enough to do that they would face a lawsuit within days. There are pro's & con's to both tractors - but as is shown here more often than not there is a fair price difference that's often the deciding factor. )</font>
Ok Now I have to elaborate on what I should have stated before.
I apologize for the "fib" word"
Kubota I believe will rate the capacities a certain point in the swing arc where the leverage is most to their advantage. For example, just look at the 4 bar linkage on the TL-1000 bucket. At full back curl the leverage is really working against the hydraulic cylinder. Because of this, the bucket dump time is quick, too quick even. The JD-110 may have slightly less peak, but the average leverage through the swing, especially at the extremes favors the JD. A visual look at the JD-110 also shows where the extra 750 lbs weight went. If one were to ram the loader of these machines into a hard pile, I would expect the Kubota to bend first, but please do not think that I am not impressed with the L39. It is far more maneuverable and has a lower CG than the JD-110.
I'm a bit sensitive to the spec's, as that's what I bought the L39 based on. Specs and price. My L39 Hydraulic pressures were set low from factory and I had a warrantee problem with the loader valve.
Now that all is right, the BH is as strong a hoe as the weight/size of the machine can handle and now at least the loader lift at ground level is strong enough to get one rear wheel off the ground a little bit if I am not lifting bucket center.
The curl is not all that strong on the L39. The main reason I am looking at the Borgford Root grapple with shorter lower tines vs the AnBo, is for the increased leverage the shorter tines will give.
With the BH stabilizers down, the L-39 loader can barely lift the front wheels using the loader, and that's with the bucket edge down. The bucket back curl will not lift the machine, but at least with the main pump pressure set correctly, the curl has some fight. Now I can take a good bite out of loose soft material with the loader.
I' appreciate if somehow my comments could get back to Kubota, and be taken as constructive input, not bashing.
The 110 is more machine that the L39, I believe Kubota is fibbing on the specs, especially the loader curl force, but again you can buy a real commercial unit for that money.)</font>
Kubota does not "fib" on their specs. If they where dumb enough to do that they would face a lawsuit within days. There are pro's & con's to both tractors - but as is shown here more often than not there is a fair price difference that's often the deciding factor. )</font>
Ok Now I have to elaborate on what I should have stated before.
I apologize for the "fib" word"
Kubota I believe will rate the capacities a certain point in the swing arc where the leverage is most to their advantage. For example, just look at the 4 bar linkage on the TL-1000 bucket. At full back curl the leverage is really working against the hydraulic cylinder. Because of this, the bucket dump time is quick, too quick even. The JD-110 may have slightly less peak, but the average leverage through the swing, especially at the extremes favors the JD. A visual look at the JD-110 also shows where the extra 750 lbs weight went. If one were to ram the loader of these machines into a hard pile, I would expect the Kubota to bend first, but please do not think that I am not impressed with the L39. It is far more maneuverable and has a lower CG than the JD-110.
I'm a bit sensitive to the spec's, as that's what I bought the L39 based on. Specs and price. My L39 Hydraulic pressures were set low from factory and I had a warrantee problem with the loader valve.
Now that all is right, the BH is as strong a hoe as the weight/size of the machine can handle and now at least the loader lift at ground level is strong enough to get one rear wheel off the ground a little bit if I am not lifting bucket center.
The curl is not all that strong on the L39. The main reason I am looking at the Borgford Root grapple with shorter lower tines vs the AnBo, is for the increased leverage the shorter tines will give.
With the BH stabilizers down, the L-39 loader can barely lift the front wheels using the loader, and that's with the bucket edge down. The bucket back curl will not lift the machine, but at least with the main pump pressure set correctly, the curl has some fight. Now I can take a good bite out of loose soft material with the loader.
I' appreciate if somehow my comments could get back to Kubota, and be taken as constructive input, not bashing.