CinderSchnauzer
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2006
- Messages
- 1,397
Here is a quote from the article:
"Buy American" is a dumb idea. It would not only not create prosperity, it would cost jobs and make us all poorer. On my Fox Business show last week, David R. Henderson, an economist at the Hoover Institution, explained why.
"Almost all economists say it's nonsense," he said. "And the reason is: We should buy things where they're cheapest. That frees up more of our resources to buy other things, and other Americans get jobs producing those things."
While I don't think protectionism is the answer, the very potential flaw with the argument put forward in the article above is this - other Americans get jobs producing those things.
What exactly are "those things?"
What skill level and resources are needed to produce "those things?"
If North American labor was not able to compete and produce "things where they are cheapest" what makes the author think they will be able to produce "those things" at the required price point?
Given the diversity of the labor market / education levels / skill levels, it strikes me as highly unlikely (even if we are able to identify "those things" and jobs are created to produce "those things") there will ever be a match between the displaced / unemployed workers and the workforce required for "those things"
Put another way, we in North America have to produce something of value that can be exported, so in the long run we can actually pay for all the goods that are imported.
So what are "those things?"
"Buy American" is a dumb idea. It would not only not create prosperity, it would cost jobs and make us all poorer. On my Fox Business show last week, David R. Henderson, an economist at the Hoover Institution, explained why.
"Almost all economists say it's nonsense," he said. "And the reason is: We should buy things where they're cheapest. That frees up more of our resources to buy other things, and other Americans get jobs producing those things."
What exactly are "those things?"
What skill level and resources are needed to produce "those things?"
If North American labor was not able to compete and produce "things where they are cheapest" what makes the author think they will be able to produce "those things" at the required price point?
Given the diversity of the labor market / education levels / skill levels, it strikes me as highly unlikely (even if we are able to identify "those things" and jobs are created to produce "those things") there will ever be a match between the displaced / unemployed workers and the workforce required for "those things"
Put another way, we in North America have to produce something of value that can be exported, so in the long run we can actually pay for all the goods that are imported.
So what are "those things?"