JB4310
Super Member
I'll give my take on this, there is no downside for the employer. There is much downside for the customer though.
This is more referring to being an independent in the construction industry, but must have some basic similarities to your line of work.
The employer wants you to be independent because it reduces their costs obviously, the customer then assumes the liability of being the employer in terms of workman's comp and other insurance coverages.
It drives the insurance companies crazy, and they have tried to rein it in, audits have to show who is paying the comp insurance for the person doing the work. Someone has to pay it or the customer is exposed to great risk.
Also their are rules that if you do more than 50% of your work for the same company you are not independent.
I know of small construction companies that have (gotten away) with doing it for 30 years and others that got shut down after 1 year.
I'm curious how this is different in your line of work.
JB
This is more referring to being an independent in the construction industry, but must have some basic similarities to your line of work.
The employer wants you to be independent because it reduces their costs obviously, the customer then assumes the liability of being the employer in terms of workman's comp and other insurance coverages.
It drives the insurance companies crazy, and they have tried to rein it in, audits have to show who is paying the comp insurance for the person doing the work. Someone has to pay it or the customer is exposed to great risk.
Also their are rules that if you do more than 50% of your work for the same company you are not independent.
I know of small construction companies that have (gotten away) with doing it for 30 years and others that got shut down after 1 year.
I'm curious how this is different in your line of work.
JB