magicheater
Veteran Member
Theres the ROPs tube. Not much volume but a great radiator.
larry
That's for sure but a foldable ROPS would have a problem though.....
Theres the ROPs tube. Not much volume but a great radiator.
larry
Actually, Im thinking you may may missed that his tractor is rated at 17PTOHP. All those implements are rated above that. Can those implements operate ok at 80% flow or is full rated speed a must? OP can pump around 9+gpm at close to 3kpsi.Well aware of all that. I'm only suggesting copying standard specifications, that fit within the horsepower rating of his machine, to give him a wide range of attachments he could run if he wanted to.
Toro Dingo 220
20 HP
10.8gpm
3000psi relief
Bobcat MT52
18.8HP
12gpm
2900psi
Ditchwitch SK350
20HP
12gpm
2300psi
I could go on, but my point is that my suggestion was standardized specs that would give him a huge range of attachments to choose from. Clearly many of those machines will stall the motor if they run up to full system pressure. That happens, I've run all of them and more. The key to those attachments working is flow, not pressure. They rarely ever hit pressure relief. I'm suggesting proven design parameters. I know they go against conventional hydraulic "wisdom", but it works, every day, on tens of thousands of commercially produced machines. Some tweak the relief pressure, some don't, but they all have a higher flow rating and have the same or less horsepower than the tractor in question.
Mr. HE![]()
Actually, Im thinking you may may missed that his tractor is rated at 17PTOHP. All those implements are rated above that. Can those implements operate ok at 80% flow or is full rated speed a must? OP can pump around 9+gpm at close to 3kpsi.
BTW Bobcat vs Ditchwitch figures do not compare correctly. ... one or both are wrong.
larry
But then I run my power broom from the PTO at idle ... far from 540, but pretty hi torque on occasion. With drive by low pressure hydraulics it would just stop. Then, with my HP limited system Id be looking for more pressure than the engine-pump combination could provide. Some implements are full speed critical -- like a mower or blower. Many arent. All implements however are torque critical. Without pressure capability behind the flow youre just out of luck.Are those implements going to run better at full pressure, partial flow? Or are they going to run better at full flow partial pressure?
My bet it full flow partial pressure. How often to you activate your safety bypass pressure setting while using a power broom, etc.?
Seems that might be 1 size too high ... but close. Can you get a HP vs RPM curve for your engine. And the ratio that the mid pto is driven? It would be nice to see if it will be able to power the pump to 3Kpsi somewhere in the range.Well......other than a deep hole in the ground... what's ya all think about a
prince # SP20B16***** Not for log splitting, a system a guy can plug
"stuff" into and do a lil work. The BX25 only has I think 3GPM's or so at the
curl, looks like almost 10GPM's from this if I can pull it off. (I drew a tank,
it is sweet! Well...we will find out when I post a pic for the pros to criique' anywho)
I found a Hydraulic T-Post driver that pulls 5.3GPM that might be perfect
for such a system, I "think" . Daunser has a hydraulic pump, EP6 that
might do OK. The gent at Danuser suggested
I can prob not spin the dirt off the auger. Not having run one, I am not
sure if that is a big deal or not.
I am drawing up what I think might be a proper circuit, stay
tuned, will she go, or will she BLOW! :laughing:
Log Splittin' is DEFINATELY on my mind, a whole differnt animal I do
believe. My limited knowledge says I am either - or, either a single gear
pump OR a hi/lo pump...I thunk...
![]()
Thats because the HP to run it at 2500psi = [2500/3000] x 20.17 = ~16.8HP. A good ploy. Answer to my question in post above would let us determine if theres anywhere in the rpm range that you could develop 3Kpsi with the system.I need to interject...
the gent that suggested this pump suggested perhaps run
the said pump at 2500 PSI. I just can't completely fathom why
but I am sure there is method to the madness. Perhaps when I post up
my proposed circuit more tells will make the tale...![]()
Thats because the HP to run it at 2500psi = [2500/3000] x 20.17 = ~16.8HP. A good ploy. Answer to my question in post above would let us determine if theres anywhere in the rpm range that you could develop 3Kpsi with the system.
larry