Once again you prove you don't know what "Critical Thinking" is.
Why not expound on this Mace? Didn't you say "Doing the same thing they did and expecting a different result is not rational."
So again, by that logic, if I have always let my child ride with me, and it's been a safe practice in the past, then shouldn't it always be? I'm just using your example.
Or maybe, just maybe, the world is not quite as black-and-white as you portray it to be. Of course it can be, once we know the outcome of a situation, because then we can condemn others for their poor choices or lack of critical thinking, because we would have been smarter than that. That goes back to my example of the lack of homicides in my town - are we safe forever or are we due? No matter how much you think about it, you can still be wrong, and when it's over, I can still be the one to say "Wow - that was stupid - why didn't you see that coming?"
Has anyone ever watched a horror movie and seen the victim decide to go check out the noise in the dark basement, while we sit on the couch and say "Man, I wouldn't do that. I'd get the heck out of there." Because we know what's going to happen - the victim's gonna get got.
My main dissent with the comment of critical thinking is the timing of it, relative to this situation. We could go through a million activities, from buying a happy meal to face jumping, and assign different degrees of hazard to them. However, it is still going to be incumbent upon each individual to "critically think" which reward is equal to or greater than the risk. This is the disconnect that I mentioned earlier - what one person thinks is an acceptable risk may not be for another, and once again, in any given set of circumstances, each person may be right and each person may be wrong.
I reiterate my comment that it is not my style to tell someone that lost a child (through what I would say is indeed an unfortunate accident) - "I told you so - you should have thought about that more." They are more than aware of that and don't need anyone else pointing it out.
And I, to a great degree, do agree with your "critical thinking", Mace. My other contention is that now you, myself, and others all have the benefit of hindsight to condemn the folks that made a poor choice, even when hundreds or thousands of folks make poor choices every day and we don't get to say "I told you so" because it didn't turn sour for them.