Anyone else hate the new light bulbs?

   / Anyone else hate the new light bulbs? #41  
I have a couple of CFL Flood light bulbs. They are on a dusk to dawn light. They have held up really good.

Sent from my GT-P3113 using TractorByNet
 
   / Anyone else hate the new light bulbs? #42  
........... The power consumption difference between CFL and LED is almost identical and therefore does not warrant paying the ridiculous cost of LED bulbs to replace CFL (yet)
This surprised me. I've replaced the incandescent bulbs in my RV with LEDs and it made a whopping difference in battery life. But the home use LEDs are about the same power consumption per lumen as a CFL. So, if a CFL works in an application it is hard to get excited about paying the extra cost for an LED.
 
Last edited:
   / Anyone else hate the new light bulbs? #43  
CFL's can take a few minutes to come up to full brightness. A poor choice for a place where you only need light for a few minutes.

When we started out with CFLs we bought the cheapest ones we could find. We got less then we paid for. Dim and did not last all that long.

The newer CFLs get bright much faster. I still have some 20 year old CFLs in the bedroom ceiling fixture that start pretty dim. It keeps the light from blinding you when somebody turns on the light in the middle of the night. After 2 or 3 minutes they finally come up to brightness, which gives our eyes time to adjust.
 
   / Anyone else hate the new light bulbs? #44  
I'm not impressed that much with cfl's. Just had one fail today. Granted its hanging upside down in the basement. I don't get more than 6 month out of these, and I find it takes a 90w labeled to equal the human visible light compared to a 60w oldie. Then you factor in the toxic interior of these and disposal issues...
 
   / Anyone else hate the new light bulbs? #45  
For the CFLs the ones with Edison bases, do not hold onto the bulb (glass tubes) and screw them in, real easy way to end their life quickly. Hold onto the base only on these, so using them in CAN lights is near impossible to correctly install them.

The daughter-n-law are all over these things and their house is terrible for light... The toxic waste of them also are going to eventually be of concern some where down the line the EPA will want to condemn any home where one broke inside more than likely :/

There are some CLFs that are OK for Dimming but I would not recommend it myself, they are known fire starters. There are also a large recall on some made in china CFLs can't remember the brand but they are fire starters even on standard switches.

On LEDs they are OK but their light is mostly a Directional light (spot light type lights) not all that great for area lighting. Most of them are good for low ceilings and inside a room if you can get over the up front costs.

Me I think the entire EPA/Department of Energy BS is dumb, most times we use Lights is in Winter and at NIGHT both means the added heat is just more warmth into the dark cold rooms in winter. Summer time lights are only last 2 hours of the night anyhow so usage is way down. When you think of having lights on for 6 or so hours in winter that is say 400 watts of heat/light into the room that you need ANYHOW... Simply idiotic Government regulations made by people who only think about 1 little part of what they think is right... Cost to make the CFLs the costs to the environment, cost to buy them all vs the energy savings is ridiculous. Over the life of the bulbs you make out on maybe 1 in 10 the others are done ahead of time from on/off cycles. The ones you leave on 24/7 or are on all night on timers are only ones you make out on. the rest of them are pretty much losers when it comes to cost per lumen used out of them over their life WHEN they are disposed of correctly. Those people that just wrap them in plastic bag & toss in the trash is not really helping to dispose of them correctly...

Mark
 
   / Anyone else hate the new light bulbs?
  • Thread Starter
#46  
I'm not impressed that much with cfl's. Just had one fail today. Granted its hanging upside down in the basement. I don't get more than 6 month out of these, and I find it takes a 90w labeled to equal the human visible light compared to a 60w oldie. Then you factor in the toxic interior of these and disposal issues...

I put these 100W equivalent bulbs in the garage and I need a flashlight to see.

if any business had invented this product with mercury in it the Feds would have sued them back to the stone age.
 
   / Anyone else hate the new light bulbs? #47  
Mercury and florescent lighting have always gone together. The CFL is just an incarnation of technology dating to the very early 1900's.

The EPA isn't going to kick anybody's door in for a broken CFL. Do you know how many florescents of all different varieties get broken in the run of a year? Probably 10's to 100's of thousands, probably millions if you include during disposal.

Is there a tiny, tiny bit of mercury in a modern florescent? Yes. Is it a risk and we need to get the guys out in yellow hazmat suits to clean it up? Hardly.

How much of the recent outrage is due to their perceived design flaws or an individual persons political viewpoint?
 
   / Anyone else hate the new light bulbs? #48  
Mercury and florescent lighting have always gone together. The CFL is just an incarnation of technology dating to the very early 1900's.

The EPA isn't going to kick anybody's door in for a broken CFL. Do you know how many florescents of all different varieties get broken in the run of a year? Probably 10's to 100's of thousands, probably millions if you include during disposal.

Is there a tiny, tiny bit of mercury in a modern florescent? Yes. Is it a risk and we need to get the guys out in yellow hazmat suits to clean it up? Hardly.

How much of the recent outrage is due to their perceived design flaws or an individual persons political viewpoint?

All of it.

How did any of us survive 12 years in a public school lighted entirely by florescent bulbs? Lots of people cover their garage ceilings with florescent lights too. Same difference.

The waste heat given off by any light bulb in Ohio is likely powered by a coal-burning power plant that spews mercury into the atmosphere. There is no free energy lunch.
 
   / Anyone else hate the new light bulbs? #49  
We went with CFLs in the house for two reasons, to save on energy costs and to not have to replace light bulbs all of the time.

In our city house we had some track lighting that went through light bulbs like a scat through a goose. I was constantly changing light bulbs. We had some hanging lights in the kitchen that I had used to replace the plastic 70's style hanging light fixtures after I bought the house. We liked the new fixtures but they used a halogen bulb that would burn out after a month or two and the bulbs were expensive. I think the kitchen fixtures and the track lighting were heating up and killing the bulbs.

Our house has 85ish can lights inside and outside the house and everyone has a CFL. Since it is a can light all of the bulbs are pointing down. I really don't think or bulb failures were from use in can fixtures since the bulbs are not heating up that much and we have some CFLS that are almost 10 years old. The bulbs that failed were just scat in the first place. Some of them failed right out of the packaging and some within days of use. The bulbs were just garbage. Most of our bulbs are R30 or R40 which means there is a glass bulb/reflector wrapped around the CFL spiral. If heat was going to kill these bulbs I don't know if the cans would have much of an effect since the bulbs are already sealed into container.

I have started to replace the R30/R40 bulbs with regular CFLs due to cost and I have found that the cheaper non brand named CFLs fail just like the R30/R30 bulbs. The bulbs we used when we built the house were all from HD while the high failure CFLs are from Lowes. I don't know if that really makes a difference though. In any case, we only buy named brand bulbs at this point.

With no AC usage the power bill is around $110 a month. A good part of the bill is clothes drying. The clothes washer uses some unbelievably low amount of power, something like $10 a year, but the dryer is a different story. It sucks up power and heated air which then get blown out of the house. With two kids, the washer and dryer run for hours each day. I have been tracking our power usage, and at night, we use around 8 KWH which is from the fridge, freezer, some lights, and phantom power usage. During the day, I can tell when the wifey has been home and when she has been doing laundry because the power usage is drastically higher than at night or when she is out of the house.

If I could get away with it, I would "buy" her a solar power clothes dryer, but I think this would cause me great pain. :laughing::laughing::laughing:

Later,
Dan
 
   / Anyone else hate the new light bulbs?
  • Thread Starter
#50  
...

With no AC usage the power bill is around $110 a month. A good part of the bill is clothes drying. ...

...

If I could get away with it, I would "buy" her a solar power clothes dryer, but I think this would cause me great pain. :laughing::laughing::laughing:

Later,
Dan

Can you guess at what percentage of your power goes to the clothes dryer? I know the amount is significant but can't find anywhere that guestimates it.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2018 Ford Explorer AWD SUV (A50324)
2018 Ford Explorer...
2025 Kivel 48in Forks and Frame Skid Steer Attachment (A50322)
2025 Kivel 48in...
2012 John Deere 7230R (A52748)
2012 John Deere...
MILLER BIG BLUE 500 PRO TOWABLE WELDER (A52472)
MILLER BIG BLUE...
20' Sea Container Mobile Hospital (A50774)
20' Sea Container...
2017 Nissan Pathfinder SUV (A50324)
2017 Nissan...
 
Top