This surprised me. I've replaced the incandescent bulbs in my RV with LEDs and it made a whopping difference in battery life. But the home use LEDs are about the same power consumption per lumen as a CFL. So, if a CFL works in an application it is hard to get excited about paying the extra cost for an LED............ The power consumption difference between CFL and LED is almost identical and therefore does not warrant paying the ridiculous cost of LED bulbs to replace CFL (yet)
CFL's can take a few minutes to come up to full brightness. A poor choice for a place where you only need light for a few minutes.
When we started out with CFLs we bought the cheapest ones we could find. We got less then we paid for. Dim and did not last all that long.
I'm not impressed that much with cfl's. Just had one fail today. Granted its hanging upside down in the basement. I don't get more than 6 month out of these, and I find it takes a 90w labeled to equal the human visible light compared to a 60w oldie. Then you factor in the toxic interior of these and disposal issues...
Mercury and florescent lighting have always gone together. The CFL is just an incarnation of technology dating to the very early 1900's.
The EPA isn't going to kick anybody's door in for a broken CFL. Do you know how many florescents of all different varieties get broken in the run of a year? Probably 10's to 100's of thousands, probably millions if you include during disposal.
Is there a tiny, tiny bit of mercury in a modern florescent? Yes. Is it a risk and we need to get the guys out in yellow hazmat suits to clean it up? Hardly.
How much of the recent outrage is due to their perceived design flaws or an individual persons political viewpoint?
...
With no AC usage the power bill is around $110 a month. A good part of the bill is clothes drying. ...
...
If I could get away with it, I would "buy" her a solar power clothes dryer, but I think this would cause me great pain. :laughing::laughing::laughing:
Later,
Dan
CFLs are the result of politics - not consumer interest. They are slow. Light is poor. Breakage is to be handled as a hazmat situation - including vacating your home.
I bought cases of the old incandescent bulbs when all this leftwing nonsense starting gaining traction. They are still available but time is short.
.
Can you guess at what percentage of your power goes to the clothes dryer? I know the amount is significant but can't find anywhere that guestimates it.
Our dryers is on a 30 amp circuit, so worst case the dryer uses 30*120=3,600 watts per hour.
Assuming that the dryer is used on average 3 hours a day, 3*3,600=10,800 watts. Power now costs us 11 or 12 cents a KWH so lets just say 12 cents for worst case. .12* 10,800= $1.30 a day. Assuming the dryer is run 30 days a week, $1.30*30 is $39 a month.
I think $39 is a bit on the high side but I bet is in the ball park, maybe $30 a month. I think the hot water heater is costing $20-30 a month. If our average power bill is $120 then the dryer is cost 25% of our bill with the hot water heater being another 16-25%.
Later,
Dan
I see my Bosch dryer is 2.8kW But your dryer is a 230V appliance, not a 110/115v one. It uses both phases that run into the house. Does the 0.12 include all the "add on" fees ? I only have NG and electricity and my washer and dryer are definitely the primary electrical loads. The washer has an element of its own to heat the water on the "sanitary" cycle which is 2 hours long, but it is great for getting white stuff squeaky clean.
Dan--thank you in a big way. I have been trying for some way to guestimate quantity usage but have zero ideas when it comes to electricity. I got "lifted" once and never got over it. Great comments.
How much of the recent outrage is due to their perceived design flaws or an individual persons political viewpoint?