A perfect example of government officials doing a static problem analysis, i.e., they don't contemplate people will change behavior in response to new laws and regulations.
1. People are not maintaining the proper air pressure in their tires and causing x deaths per y miles driven. (insert a very low number for x and a very high number for y)
2. Mandate an expensive solution layered with regulations.
3. Problem solved....until there are problems with the solution or people have to spend additional money to maintain it.
4. Return to Step 2.
I'm not against this technology per se. When I have the chance to pull my travel trailer coast-to-coast, I'll likely have aftermarket tpms sensors on the trailer.
The car industry has finally taken note that dramatically fewer young people are buying cars. There are a few factors in this trend. If TPMS sensors become mandatory Safety check items, then they just serve as another financial barrier to used car ownership, for people of limited means.
While I'm glad the technology is available, I would prefer that it not be mandatory, esp. in the Used market.
I brought this point up in a PM discussion - it does bear consideration:
Given the legal climate in the USA, how long before the Manufacturers are litigated to the point where they either force the engine into Limp Home Mode, or shut the Engine off altogether, based on low TPMS readings ?
If you find this situation irritating now, wait till you have to drive home at 10mph, because a sensor failed !
Rgds, D.