Hard to understand how that's possible. I thought any time the tires locked up, your stop distance increased. Can you elaborate?
Lots of debate on that issue, for sure. IMO, on a high traction surface, locking up a new tire dissipates a lot of energy in a hurry.
In a case like URs (he had no other space to maneuver into), as long as the driver can tolerate a bit of vehicle rotation, you'll continue more or less in a straight line, as you burn rubber.
Hard to keyboard quarterback many of these situations......... probably what most people need to understand is that ABS was firstly designed (automotive applications that is) so that people could retain
steering control.
So while ABS dumbed down what people had to do with a brake pedal (just stand on it !), it actually requires more skill in terms of accident avoidance (ie. don't target fixate) for people to get the most out of it. IMO anyway.
Not what UR had, but the consensus seems to be that on loose surfaces, ABS
increases braking distances. Audi used to provide a dash switch to turn Off ABS, for this reason - but that switch likely got lawyered out of N. American cars by now....
"ABS generally offers improved vehicle control and decreases stopping distances on dry and slippery surfaces for many drivers; however, on loose surfaces like gravel or snow-covered pavement, ABS can significantly increase braking distance, although still improving vehicle control."
Anti-lock braking system - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Locking up non-ABS wheels, some people will freak out about the sound (and/or vehicle rotation) and back off the pedal. The same issue happened with early noisy ABS systems - people would back off the pedal if they got noise or vibration. UR is olde school enough to ride out the lock-up, to a non-contact finish - not every driver would, so ABS may be a better choice for many, today.
I'd prefer (for their own sake) if people thought of ABS as a steering enhancement, as it definitely doesn't
always improve braking performance.
Rgds, D.