Piston
Elite Member
I went to look at the Pioneer 700, and the Ranger 900Xp. I also looked at the Yamaha Viking, and test drove the Kubota 1100RTV with cab. I REALLY wanted to love the Kubota, I was sad I didn't. I even had my wife and toddler in there with me, driving around the tractor dealership :laughing: She didn't like it either, I was really disappointed in that.
I didn't like the Viking. I loved the Ranger, even though I went in with 99% certainty that I was going to want the Honda. I just didn't like the ergonomics of it for some reason. I'm still weighing the options between the Pioneer and Ranger.
The main thing is though, being used to a golf cart, I really love the maneuverability of the small platform. I like how I can drive through my fence gate, and turn around in the smallest spaces. Sitting on the larger machines makes them feel huge, almost as big as a Jeep, just lower to the ground. This is when I started looking at the smaller machines, like the RZR, although it's a little too "sporty" for my tastes. Then I found the Pioneer 500. It really seems like a nice fit and a nice compromise. I like the transmission a lot.
My hesitation with the smaller machine, is the lack of payload, tow capacity, speed, and power. I really like power. I actually want to hold out now for the 2015 900XP Ranger, because it has a 13% boost in hp, up to 68hp. Will I EVER use this power??? NO, probably not. So it's stupid of me to want it, but you know what, I do.
Practically speaking, I think the Pioneer 500 makes good sense. For instance, what do I need payload and tow capacity for when I have a tractor? For the most part my golf cart is enough for me, I mainly just drive through the woods looking at trees while crawling along drinking a cold beer and enjoying the wilderness. I don't need 68hp to do that!
Sorry for the useless post, I guess I'm trying to say that I think the Pioneer 500 is going to be a very practical machine at a good price point. I may be trying to convince myself that I should think some more about the practicality of it, and keep some money in the bank at the same time!
I didn't like the Viking. I loved the Ranger, even though I went in with 99% certainty that I was going to want the Honda. I just didn't like the ergonomics of it for some reason. I'm still weighing the options between the Pioneer and Ranger.
The main thing is though, being used to a golf cart, I really love the maneuverability of the small platform. I like how I can drive through my fence gate, and turn around in the smallest spaces. Sitting on the larger machines makes them feel huge, almost as big as a Jeep, just lower to the ground. This is when I started looking at the smaller machines, like the RZR, although it's a little too "sporty" for my tastes. Then I found the Pioneer 500. It really seems like a nice fit and a nice compromise. I like the transmission a lot.
My hesitation with the smaller machine, is the lack of payload, tow capacity, speed, and power. I really like power. I actually want to hold out now for the 2015 900XP Ranger, because it has a 13% boost in hp, up to 68hp. Will I EVER use this power??? NO, probably not. So it's stupid of me to want it, but you know what, I do.
Practically speaking, I think the Pioneer 500 makes good sense. For instance, what do I need payload and tow capacity for when I have a tractor? For the most part my golf cart is enough for me, I mainly just drive through the woods looking at trees while crawling along drinking a cold beer and enjoying the wilderness. I don't need 68hp to do that!
Sorry for the useless post, I guess I'm trying to say that I think the Pioneer 500 is going to be a very practical machine at a good price point. I may be trying to convince myself that I should think some more about the practicality of it, and keep some money in the bank at the same time!