Your first paragraph is all true. I do tree work for money...and insurance payments...lol
Don't know many homeowners that would shell out 700 bucks for a top handle saw anyway (Stihl and Husky are within a couple bucks of each other FYI).
The only reason I didn't get the Husky after the Stihl turd was a fellow arborist recommeded the Tanaka and it is a fantastic professional atborist saw, better balance than the Stihl and 2 times the balls plus it hot starts with one pull, something small saws don't usually do, they hot vapor lock instead.
I always warm up my tree saws on the ground prior to getting aloft but nothing more aggrivating than multiple pulls on the recoil and no fire in the hole when you are 30 or 40 or 50 feet up in a tree, Thats a pisser and that's not the Tanaka. First pull always. Best 240 bucks I've ever spent on a saw and I plan on getting a couple more.. Can't speak for the conventional rear handle saws, only the top handle........ and yes, a top handle, short bar saw (bumper rakers or not) is not a homeowners saw. Homeowners have no business in any tree with a chainsaw. Thats a trip to ER or worse, waiting to happen.
In a tree or on the ground, you'll always find me in kevlar chaps hearing protection and hard hat. Been reading the thread and I see Poulan mentioned. Never cated for them. At one time years ago I bought a huge Poulan with a bow on it for just bucking, Spent more time vapor locked than using it. My favorite all time saw (that I still have and use is an 075 Stihl with a 36 roller nose running 404 square tooth
chipper chain and modified rakers. Not a homeowner saw either. Good for one thing only, large diameter bucking.