the8080
Member
Good picture skyhook. I think we just have a terminology issue. We were just trying to say that the CG is the circle on your drawing and is in a fixed position on the tractor, no matter how the tractor is tipped.
The 60% on the back axle was just a reasonable number to use. Same with the 500lb ballast. Depending on rear mower weight and how it is adjusted, your rear axle weight will go up and the effect of your 200lb wheel weights will go down as a %. With 200lb ballast the original calculations show a 20% increase in stability with the 200lb wheel weight. In real life, say you increase the rear axle weight by 50% with an operator in seat and a mower lifted off the ground, then the 200lb wheel weight would give you about 15% increase in stability. The spacers still give same % stability increase as before because this is depended on the ratio of old wheel width to new wheel width. Not real scientific but will give you a feel for the relative effects of these changes. And remember, these numbers don't even try to address rollover angle, safe mowing slope, speed, etc.
The 60% on the back axle was just a reasonable number to use. Same with the 500lb ballast. Depending on rear mower weight and how it is adjusted, your rear axle weight will go up and the effect of your 200lb wheel weights will go down as a %. With 200lb ballast the original calculations show a 20% increase in stability with the 200lb wheel weight. In real life, say you increase the rear axle weight by 50% with an operator in seat and a mower lifted off the ground, then the 200lb wheel weight would give you about 15% increase in stability. The spacers still give same % stability increase as before because this is depended on the ratio of old wheel width to new wheel width. Not real scientific but will give you a feel for the relative effects of these changes. And remember, these numbers don't even try to address rollover angle, safe mowing slope, speed, etc.