KennyG
Elite Member
KennyG, Thanks for that. Is my understanding correct that, as with molten salts in a solar powered system (where the sun's heat is concentrated to heat the salts to a liquid state - typical temps exceed 1000F according to the 'net, the heat is then used to produce steam to drive generators?
If that is so, then the salts are storing heat, which is capable of continually being renewed to working temperature by the reactor (if I understand correctly) since you are saying that all but 1% or so of the heat is unused in the steam production. That would make it similar to the way the solar heated method operates (this keeps me on topic!!) except that the solar method stores the heat for use overnight, and uses much more of the stored heat, possibly/probably/definitely enough that the salts return to a solid state due to the drop in temperature, therefore needing to be reheated to a much greater degree than that used in the nuclear method.
The nuclear also has the advantage of being able to add more heat on a permanent basis, (must add more to maintain the cooling process?) whereas the solar relies on the sun during daylight hours. Or, if the stored heat at sunrise in the solar method still remains high enough to produce steam for the generators, it merely needs to be "topped up" as with the nuclear method. I do not know, because the blurb is all about being able to produce electricity from the sun during the night. As with most things in life neither side gives you the full info.
Yes, the "solar thermal" plants heat the salt and the heat in the salt is used to boil high pressure water, run the turbines and generate electricity. After the sun goes down, the salt can continue to generate steam until the salt temperature drops. As the temperature drops, the steam cycle efficiency drops, from as high as over 40% to probably less than 30% until the temperature drops low enough the salt begins to solidify. Keep in mind when we say "salt" we aren't talking about table salt, we're talking about a chemical compound in the salt family. Solar plants use salts that melt at 300 deg F to 400 deg F. You can't let the temperature of the storage facility drop to the solidification temperature because reheating takes a long time. Nuclear reactor salt will usually have a higher melting point because nuclear characteristics are more important than a low melting point.
Nuclear reactors, like any other steam cycle based generating facility convert 30 to 50% of the heat to electricity. During operation, most of the heat comes from nuclear fission. When the plant shuts down, that heat is no longer being generated. However, decay heat is generated from the results of the fission process. That is initially about 1% of the original power generation and slowly decreases over a period of time. The ability to "store" or "absorb" energy in the molten salt reactors is advantageous from a safety standpoint, but not important for operation because you can generate heat at any time from the reactor in operation.
Interestingly enough, the European/US countries have focused on molten salt as a coolant, while the Russians have focused on molten lead. They have similar characteristics and advantages. I'm not an expert in this area, but it appears salt is better from a contamination control/nuclear design aspect but lead has advantages from a materials stability (less corrosive) viewpoint.