Helpful neighbor!

[lostcreekranch]

I'm embarrassed that Thall303 claims to be from Texas? Seems he is incapable of any resemblance of a positive, supportive response for a fellow member of TBN.

SA the rest of us are in your corner!

 

[Thall303]

Not to worry.....I'm sure you are frequently embarrassed!

 

[k0ua]

I'm embarrassed that Thall303 claims to be from Texas? Seems he is incapable of any resemblance of a positive, supportive response for a fellow member of TBN.

SA the rest of us are in your corner!

Roger that. :thumbsup:

 

[k0ua]

Not to worry.....I'm sure you are frequently embarrassed!

You seem to be just a troublemaker. What say you? You have 126 posts, and you are making friends fast. Why join a group and pixx people off? Or am I missing something here?

 

[BigCountry1689]

It seems Mr. Thall303 has only become active as of late, me thinks he is looking for attention. Apparently he is lacking in the human interaction department and at 68 YOA needs some keyboard conversation, he has tried a couple of times to get a weapon conversation started in the "Good Morning" thread to no avail. with a couple other interjections here and there that have been ignored. THall303 might have overlooked the fact that others are asking for updates on this incident and that Shield Arc only responds when others post inquires.

"Just about milked this incident to death!"

"Might be a good idea to hear her side of the argument?"

"My experience with cases like this give me reason to question if we have all of the information or just what the plaintiffs self serving narrative..."

"Not impugning your integrity, just suggesting that you, as many of us do have selective memories and they are almost always self serving."

"Dude...can't get money from someone who has none. You can't go to jail for being broke and unable to pay and the judge knows this"

"Newsflash!!! Maybe the neighbor lady is broke???

Another person who believes that people are victims when held accountable for their choices.

**I wonder if he would have drug her drunk arse out of the house.

 

[the old grind]

... am I missing something here?

... Any point or contribution made by our recent, uninformed visitor?

If there's a corner to be in, the poor lady has certainly backed herself into one, and if court-ordered restitution is in arrears SA isn't a guy who'd try to beat her out of more of "what ain't". IMO, his patience this far along is commendable. :thumbsup:

btw, Post by post, we're telling our Texas friend what has happened, if not in a context as familiar to those of us ... uh, who have followed this thread from page one, whether commenting much or not.

 

[Thall303]

You seem to be just a troublemaker. What say you? You have 126 posts, and you are making friends fast. Why join a group and pixx people off? Or am I missing something here?

I joined for the information on tractors and other farm related machinery.

Was pleasantly surprised with all the building projects and love the good morning section.

Don't much enjoy a bunch of old ladies commenting on things they know little about.

Anyway, keep us informed when this dastardly old neighbor lady is thrown in jail for failure to pay.

 

[lilranch2001]

As I told you several pages back then, don't read the thread....
For an attorney you do not seem all that smart to me!

 

[Furu]

IT IS OFTEN SAID DON'T FEED THE TROLL.

Well I am going to feed it anyway.

To: Terry Hall (Thall303) or whomever you really are.

You stated

I normally charge for my legal advice and have long ago found out that many people ignore the advice given.

You have thus purported yourself to be a lawyer since you claim that you normally charge for your legal advice. (Oh by the way the state of Texas does not have you listed as a member of the Bar, past or present, so maybe you misrepresented yourself as to your name or profession. Terry Hall

My experience with cases like this give me reason to question if we have all of the information or just what the plaintiffs self serving narrative has provided.

I don't know whom you think is the plaintiff here. If you had read the thread you would understand that SA does not currently have a solicitor, he is not representing himself pro se either. That is because in this legal proceeding the State is the one who has filed against the defendant and taken them to a court proceeding. SA is not the Plaintiff in this case.
Yes, once upon a time there was a civil suit. Yes there was a judgement. That is in years past. Now is now and there is a criminal charge as I understand it. The judge is trying to give the lady an out from the criminal charge IF she deals with the prior years civil court finding and judgement.

It is now a criminal issue and that is why there have been multiple references to the prosecuting attorney's office not to the plaintiff's attorney.
SA goes to court to observe the goings on. The State is the charging body.

Many solicitors charge their clients for work and have made no effort at being fully up to speed. Others do shoddy work and log "billable hours" for improper written documents then log more "billable hours" not only for the original but then for the corrections that they negligently failed to do correctly the first time.

If you are indeed as you have purported yourself to be (by your own statement), I would have hated to be the client that paid for work that you performed as it would have been a multi-corrected document/work product to get it correct and would have cost many more billable hours than it should have.

You clearly have not read the information that is in the thread. While it does not include the lady's (who is criminally charged) version, you have demonstrated that you have no grasp, of even the basics of the story, so what difference would that make even if it was presented. You would not have read that either.

Now I would say "walk away" but this is the internet so how about "mouse away", "track-ball away" or "stylus-away." JUST GO AWAY.
If you are not interested in the thread look elsewhere and stop trolling for conflict.

Have a good day just have it elsewhere.

 

[k0ua]

IT IS OFTEN SAID DON'T FEED THE TROLL.

Well I am going to feed it anyway.

To: Terry Hall (Thall303) or whomever you really are.

You stated



You have thus purported yourself to be a lawyer since you claim that you normally charge for your legal advice. (Oh by the way the state of Texas does not have you listed as a member of the Bar, past or present, so maybe you misrepresented yourself as to your name or profession. Terry Hall



I don't know whom you think is the plaintiff here. If you had read the thread you would understand that SA does not currently have a solicitor, he is not representing himself pro se either. That is because in this legal proceeding the State is the one who has filed against the defendant and taken them to a court proceeding. SA is not the Plaintiff in this case.
Yes, once upon a time there was a civil suit. Yes there was a judgement. That is in years past. Now is now and there is a criminal charge as I understand it. The judge is trying to give the lady an out from the criminal charge IF she deals with the prior years civil court finding and judgement.

It is now a criminal issue and that is why there have been multiple references to the prosecuting attorney's office not to the plaintiff's attorney.
SA goes to court to observe the goings on. The State is the charging body.

Many solicitors charge their clients for work and have made no effort at being fully up to speed. Others do shoddy work and log "billable hours" for improper written documents then log more "billable hours" not only for the original but then for the corrections that they negligently failed to do correctly the first time.

If you are indeed as you have purported yourself to be (by your own statement), I would have hated to be the client that paid for work that you performed as it would have been a multi-corrected document/work product to get it correct and would have cost many more billable hours than it should have.

You clearly have not read the information that is in the thread. While it does not include the lady's (who is criminally charged) version, you have demonstrated that you have no grasp, of even the basics of the story, so what difference would that make even if it was presented. You would not have read that either.

Now I would say "walk away" but this is the internet so how about "mouse away", "track-ball away" or "stylus-away." JUST GO AWAY.
If you are not interested in the thread look elsewhere and stop trolling for conflict.

Have a good day just have it elsewhere.

Very well said.. :thumbsup: