Helpful neighbor!

[Shield Arc]

Thall303 I don't know you, and you don't know me. Members here Furu, and dragoneggs have been to my place, and looked me right in the eye. I think they will vouch for my creditability.

 

[Thall303]

Not impugning your integrity, just suggesting that you, as many of us do have selective memories and they are almost always self serving.

I have been awarded many judgments and only have collected on a very few.

Any good lawyer would tell you the same thing.

Good luck.

 

[farm boy00]

Not impugning your integrity, just suggesting that you, as many of us do have selective memories and they are almost always self serving.

I have been awarded many judgments and only have collected on a very few.

Any good lawyer would tell you the same thing.

Good luck.

Thall, have you even read this thread fully??

 

[Midniteoyl]

Not impugning your integrity, just suggesting that you, as many of us do have selective memories and they are almost always self serving.

I have been awarded many judgments and only have collected on a very few.

Any good lawyer would tell you the same thing.

Good luck.

This is about the only thing you have said that I agree with.. It is very hard to actually collect on a civil judgement. SA if finding this out now. I have many judgements on many people due to being a landlord. No one has actually paid up, and no court has actually allowed any form of garnishment. In my cases, since they are renters, there is not even property to place a lien on. This is the one thing that SA has going for him, though it could take many years to see if it does any good as his lien will be absolutely last on the list behind any banks, taxes, etc.. Sometimes its just not worth it to pursue.

 

[Thall303]

This is about the only thing you have said that I agree with.. It is very hard to actually collect on a civil judgement. SA if finding this out now. I have many judgements on many people due to being a landlord. No one has actually paid up, and no court has actually allowed any form of garnishment. In my cases, since they are renters, there is not even property to place a lien on. This is the one thing that SA has going for him, though it could take many years to see if it does any good as his lien will be absolutely last on the list behind any banks, taxes, etc.. Sometimes its just not worth it to pursue.

If you read carefully, that is all I have ever said.

I normally charge for my legal advice and have long ago found out that many people ignore the advice given.

Most of the legal advice given by well meaning people unfortunately is worth exactly what was charged!

I wish the man luck, but have also learned over the years that pragmatism always trumps emotions!

 

[TheMan419]

Might be a good idea to hear her side of the argument?

Court already got her side of the argument. She was found guilty. We are now at the collection phase and revocation of probation phase. What more do you want to know of her side? I suppose you could represent her on the PCR phase pro bono if you are that gung ho on her side?

 

[Arc weld]

She should have been charged trespassing as well. Missing court dates and everything else should certainly make the judge less sympathetic to her. I think she's playing the system but SA isn't backing down and going away. If he gets a lien on her property, he wins in the long run.

 

[Thall303]

Court already got her side of the argument. She was found guilty. We are now at the collection phase and revocation of probation phase. What more do you want to know of her side? I suppose you could represent her on the PCR phase pro bono if you are that gung ho on her side?

Gung Ho??

Hardly

The law does not recognize emotions!

I wish the man luck, but pragmatism almost always is inevitable.

 

[dragoneggs]

She should have been charged trespassing as well. Missing court dates and everything else should certainly make the judge less sympathetic to her. I think she's playing the system but SA isn't backing down and going away. If he gets a lien on her property, he wins in the long run.

And if nothing else... it is the principle. I would look into a property lien and interest charges... yes hopefully a 'win' in the long run. Can't be letting people not own up to their responsibilities. Too much of that going on these days.

 

[dragoneggs]

Thall303 I don't know you, and you don't know me. Members here Furu, and dragoneggs have been to my place, and looked me right in the eye. I think they will vouch for my creditability.

:anyone:...

 

[lostcreekranch]

I'm embarrassed that Thall303 claims to be from Texas? Seems he is incapable of any resemblance of a positive, supportive response for a fellow member of TBN.

SA the rest of us are in your corner!

 

[Thall303]

Not to worry.....I'm sure you are frequently embarrassed!

 

[k0ua]

I'm embarrassed that Thall303 claims to be from Texas? Seems he is incapable of any resemblance of a positive, supportive response for a fellow member of TBN.

SA the rest of us are in your corner!

Roger that. :thumbsup:

 

[k0ua]

Not to worry.....I'm sure you are frequently embarrassed!

You seem to be just a troublemaker. What say you? You have 126 posts, and you are making friends fast. Why join a group and pixx people off? Or am I missing something here?

 

[BigCountry1689]

It seems Mr. Thall303 has only become active as of late, me thinks he is looking for attention. Apparently he is lacking in the human interaction department and at 68 YOA needs some keyboard conversation, he has tried a couple of times to get a weapon conversation started in the "Good Morning" thread to no avail. with a couple other interjections here and there that have been ignored. THall303 might have overlooked the fact that others are asking for updates on this incident and that Shield Arc only responds when others post inquires.

"Just about milked this incident to death!"

"Might be a good idea to hear her side of the argument?"

"My experience with cases like this give me reason to question if we have all of the information or just what the plaintiffs self serving narrative..."

"Not impugning your integrity, just suggesting that you, as many of us do have selective memories and they are almost always self serving."

"Dude...can't get money from someone who has none. You can't go to jail for being broke and unable to pay and the judge knows this"

"Newsflash!!! Maybe the neighbor lady is broke???

Another person who believes that people are victims when held accountable for their choices.

**I wonder if he would have drug her drunk arse out of the house.

 

[the old grind]

... am I missing something here?

... Any point or contribution made by our recent, uninformed visitor?

If there's a corner to be in, the poor lady has certainly backed herself into one, and if court-ordered restitution is in arrears SA isn't a guy who'd try to beat her out of more of "what ain't". IMO, his patience this far along is commendable. :thumbsup:

btw, Post by post, we're telling our Texas friend what has happened, if not in a context as familiar to those of us ... uh, who have followed this thread from page one, whether commenting much or not.

 

[Thall303]

You seem to be just a troublemaker. What say you? You have 126 posts, and you are making friends fast. Why join a group and pixx people off? Or am I missing something here?

I joined for the information on tractors and other farm related machinery.

Was pleasantly surprised with all the building projects and love the good morning section.

Don't much enjoy a bunch of old ladies commenting on things they know little about.

Anyway, keep us informed when this dastardly old neighbor lady is thrown in jail for failure to pay.

 

[lilranch2001]

As I told you several pages back then, don't read the thread....
For an attorney you do not seem all that smart to me!

 

[Furu]

IT IS OFTEN SAID DON'T FEED THE TROLL.

Well I am going to feed it anyway.

To: Terry Hall (Thall303) or whomever you really are.

You stated

I normally charge for my legal advice and have long ago found out that many people ignore the advice given.

You have thus purported yourself to be a lawyer since you claim that you normally charge for your legal advice. (Oh by the way the state of Texas does not have you listed as a member of the Bar, past or present, so maybe you misrepresented yourself as to your name or profession. Terry Hall

My experience with cases like this give me reason to question if we have all of the information or just what the plaintiffs self serving narrative has provided.

I don't know whom you think is the plaintiff here. If you had read the thread you would understand that SA does not currently have a solicitor, he is not representing himself pro se either. That is because in this legal proceeding the State is the one who has filed against the defendant and taken them to a court proceeding. SA is not the Plaintiff in this case.
Yes, once upon a time there was a civil suit. Yes there was a judgement. That is in years past. Now is now and there is a criminal charge as I understand it. The judge is trying to give the lady an out from the criminal charge IF she deals with the prior years civil court finding and judgement.

It is now a criminal issue and that is why there have been multiple references to the prosecuting attorney's office not to the plaintiff's attorney.
SA goes to court to observe the goings on. The State is the charging body.

Many solicitors charge their clients for work and have made no effort at being fully up to speed. Others do shoddy work and log "billable hours" for improper written documents then log more "billable hours" not only for the original but then for the corrections that they negligently failed to do correctly the first time.

If you are indeed as you have purported yourself to be (by your own statement), I would have hated to be the client that paid for work that you performed as it would have been a multi-corrected document/work product to get it correct and would have cost many more billable hours than it should have.

You clearly have not read the information that is in the thread. While it does not include the lady's (who is criminally charged) version, you have demonstrated that you have no grasp, of even the basics of the story, so what difference would that make even if it was presented. You would not have read that either.

Now I would say "walk away" but this is the internet so how about "mouse away", "track-ball away" or "stylus-away." JUST GO AWAY.
If you are not interested in the thread look elsewhere and stop trolling for conflict.

Have a good day just have it elsewhere.

 

[k0ua]

IT IS OFTEN SAID DON'T FEED THE TROLL.

Well I am going to feed it anyway.

To: Terry Hall (Thall303) or whomever you really are.

You stated



You have thus purported yourself to be a lawyer since you claim that you normally charge for your legal advice. (Oh by the way the state of Texas does not have you listed as a member of the Bar, past or present, so maybe you misrepresented yourself as to your name or profession. Terry Hall



I don't know whom you think is the plaintiff here. If you had read the thread you would understand that SA does not currently have a solicitor, he is not representing himself pro se either. That is because in this legal proceeding the State is the one who has filed against the defendant and taken them to a court proceeding. SA is not the Plaintiff in this case.
Yes, once upon a time there was a civil suit. Yes there was a judgement. That is in years past. Now is now and there is a criminal charge as I understand it. The judge is trying to give the lady an out from the criminal charge IF she deals with the prior years civil court finding and judgement.

It is now a criminal issue and that is why there have been multiple references to the prosecuting attorney's office not to the plaintiff's attorney.
SA goes to court to observe the goings on. The State is the charging body.

Many solicitors charge their clients for work and have made no effort at being fully up to speed. Others do shoddy work and log "billable hours" for improper written documents then log more "billable hours" not only for the original but then for the corrections that they negligently failed to do correctly the first time.

If you are indeed as you have purported yourself to be (by your own statement), I would have hated to be the client that paid for work that you performed as it would have been a multi-corrected document/work product to get it correct and would have cost many more billable hours than it should have.

You clearly have not read the information that is in the thread. While it does not include the lady's (who is criminally charged) version, you have demonstrated that you have no grasp, of even the basics of the story, so what difference would that make even if it was presented. You would not have read that either.

Now I would say "walk away" but this is the internet so how about "mouse away", "track-ball away" or "stylus-away." JUST GO AWAY.
If you are not interested in the thread look elsewhere and stop trolling for conflict.

Have a good day just have it elsewhere.

Very well said.. :thumbsup: