DavesTractor
Elite Member
Some thoughts: Duty cycle is the big deal I think, as many have mentioned. On pickups, like a 3500 Ram with a Cummins and a regular pickup bed you get 385 HP and 900 torque. Order that as a cab and chassis and it drops to 325/750. I think it is the same way with GM and Ford. If they actually think we are going to use the rig hard, they give us less!
As for the comment about the 2565 and 2555 being the same except for 10 HP, that is not the case. The 2565 is 800 lbs heavier, 8" longer and uses heavier axles.
There are however other examples you could use that would illustrate your point. The 1533/1538 are the same tractor except the 1538 has larger tires and a different "tune". The 3540 and 3550 likewise share the same engine, different tune and tires. It just happens to be that the 2555 and 2565 are almost entirely different from one another.
As for re-flashing the ECM and making the 2555 an 85 HP tractor, certainly it would seem with 2.6L that should be achievable (disregarding EPA laws...which I don't recommend) but then would the drivetrain hold up? Would the radiator and AC work if you were actually using all that HP to run a 12' mower through tall grass in the summer? I suspect you would over heat the radiator and then max the head pressure on the AC and have all sorts of issues.
Having said that, I'm a tinkerer and hot rodder at heart. My last fast car had a cam/tune with >600 hp and under 3100 lbs, more than once I transferred a bunch of rubber from my tires to my fender wells. It's nearly irresistible. It makes no sense to turn expensive tires into smoke, but man does it put a grim on a guys face. So I am with you in the concept of "more power" but you probably ought to not tinker with the power on a Tier IV tractor. Get an old 70-80's International and put a turbo on it. Turn it up until it blows or you run out of nerve.
As for the comment about the 2565 and 2555 being the same except for 10 HP, that is not the case. The 2565 is 800 lbs heavier, 8" longer and uses heavier axles.
There are however other examples you could use that would illustrate your point. The 1533/1538 are the same tractor except the 1538 has larger tires and a different "tune". The 3540 and 3550 likewise share the same engine, different tune and tires. It just happens to be that the 2555 and 2565 are almost entirely different from one another.
As for re-flashing the ECM and making the 2555 an 85 HP tractor, certainly it would seem with 2.6L that should be achievable (disregarding EPA laws...which I don't recommend) but then would the drivetrain hold up? Would the radiator and AC work if you were actually using all that HP to run a 12' mower through tall grass in the summer? I suspect you would over heat the radiator and then max the head pressure on the AC and have all sorts of issues.
Having said that, I'm a tinkerer and hot rodder at heart. My last fast car had a cam/tune with >600 hp and under 3100 lbs, more than once I transferred a bunch of rubber from my tires to my fender wells. It's nearly irresistible. It makes no sense to turn expensive tires into smoke, but man does it put a grim on a guys face. So I am with you in the concept of "more power" but you probably ought to not tinker with the power on a Tier IV tractor. Get an old 70-80's International and put a turbo on it. Turn it up until it blows or you run out of nerve.