I do a ton of research, so finding this site came quickly in my search.
I will have to decide if adding remotes and an aftermarket backhoe is more cost effective than trading in at some point.
I really need a grapple and box blade at the moment, and including those, a gc1710/gc1720 didn't fit the budget.
Really interesting power difference MF chose in the various models, and in a way advantages to each. For example, only .2hp less at the PTO in the lower power models (@540rpm) but lower engine rpm. The extra 2.5 engine hp at full rpm surely comes in handy, but I haven't ran out of power yet, only traction/hydraulics. Would have been great to have the better seat and light guards though. I have had a few issues running out of hydrostatic power in reverse (low range) when sloped down hill in soft conditions, and I wonder if the higher rpm and relative lower gearing would have made a difference. All in all, though, it is performing well and I am happy with the machine.
Anyways, here she is, in all her muddy, missouri rain glory.
I will have to decide if adding remotes and an aftermarket backhoe is more cost effective than trading in at some point.
I really need a grapple and box blade at the moment, and including those, a gc1710/gc1720 didn't fit the budget.
Really interesting power difference MF chose in the various models, and in a way advantages to each. For example, only .2hp less at the PTO in the lower power models (@540rpm) but lower engine rpm. The extra 2.5 engine hp at full rpm surely comes in handy, but I haven't ran out of power yet, only traction/hydraulics. Would have been great to have the better seat and light guards though. I have had a few issues running out of hydrostatic power in reverse (low range) when sloped down hill in soft conditions, and I wonder if the higher rpm and relative lower gearing would have made a difference. All in all, though, it is performing well and I am happy with the machine.
Anyways, here she is, in all her muddy, missouri rain glory.