Electric Cars: Chev Bolt seems to be the first practical one.

Status
Not open for further replies.
   / Electric Cars: Chev Bolt seems to be the first practical one. #181  
Interesting! "The W-15 comes equipped with an external 7.2 kw power outlet providing up to 30 amps directly from the vehicle battery pack." There's the inverter solution recently discussed here.

"Chassis Assembly Plant
940 South Rt. 32
Union City, IN 47390"

Hey MossRoad - is that close enough to go for a looksee?

Added: Google search indicates that plant was used to put RV coachwork on Chevrolet chassises (chassix?) until recently.

That's right on the way to Nowhere, OH!! Yikes. About as rural as you can get in Indiana. Google it and look at the cornfields. 3 hour and change drive from here.
 
   / Electric Cars: Chev Bolt seems to be the first practical one.
  • Thread Starter
#182  
Out of curiosity, are the bottom cushions of the back seats intended to flip forward and up to fill in this gap?
I know that on my Volvos they had that gap unless you flipped the bottom of seat forward.
Every station wagon and SUV I've owned had a fold-forward rear seat cushion. (Then rear seatbacks that folded forward to meet that folded cushion).

I saw these Bolt seats had a full 'skirt' to the floor like a sedan with no place for a hinge. I asked and the sales rep verified that the bases are fixed, only the seatbacks fold.
 
   / Electric Cars: Chev Bolt seems to be the first practical one. #183  
Every station wagon and SUV I've owned had a fold-forward rear seat cushion. (Then rear seatbacks that folded forward to meet that folded cushion).
I saw these Bolt seats had a full 'skirt' to the floor like a sedan with no place for a hinge. I asked and the sales rep verified that the bases are fixed, only the seatbacks fold.
That is weird.

Aaron Z
 
   / Electric Cars: Chev Bolt seems to be the first practical one. #184  
Anyone familiar with a MB C350e.
 
Last edited:
   / Electric Cars: Chev Bolt seems to be the first practical one. #186  
Interesting thread. I actually read it all.....

I'm an engineer, and an electric car intrigues me. Part of me wants one, but they're just "not there", IMO.

I can get a honda accord cvt that gets 45+mpg. The payoff for a hybrid sure isn't there. I sure can't see that electric is either. It has to be subsidized, which pretty obviously shows that the economics aren't there. Its interesting that the economics are there for some and not others, as if the prices are any different.

The maintenance free.......boy, I dunno about that either. I have a Civic with 173,xxx on it. I have hardly done jack to that car. Sure, I've done the front brakes....ONCE. An electric has a braking system too, even if they're used less. How much less than 80K+ do you want? I've done rear shocks, but electrics have those too. There's an awful lot of car that *isn't* the engine that needs maintenance eventually.

Regen braking....Actually, hydraulics are a *great* solution. To a degree, a flywheel or PTO mounted pump/motor. It pressurizes to a tank, then releases back through the motor. Busses, garbage trucks, UPS, Fedex etc. are the biggest gains. To this point, it's entertaining to put all this time/money/effort into such small gains. So I can get 50 in my prius instead of 45 in a "normal car". Why not put the effort into fleet vehicles, which run more often, more miles, with higher gains. If I can get that city bus from 1 mpg to 3 mpg over it's half million mile life...

Along the same lines, in Ludington, MI there is one of the biggest batteries I'm aware of. Water pumped from lake MI to a reservoir during the night, and makes power during the day going back down. Ludington pumped storage....
Ludington Pumped Storage Plant Increases Efficiency to Provide Greater Grid Support

Saw a thing on PBS about "normal" solutions to energy problems. There was a modified AC unit that made huge tubs of ice at night, then barely used any energy all day long. If there's cheaper power at night, these kinds of things happen all by themselves. If that AC is more efficient, it, as a whole, frees up "fuel" of some sort for uses elsewhere.

I think you guyz'z troll claims for someone actively disagreeing isn't particularly fair. Some comments were troll, to me. But certainly not all. I don't doubt for a second that "reliability issues" could be overlooked by "the media". Not a conspiracy, but not the narrative that's desired. "the media" can dismiss them, just like the collective participants of this thread did (think about it). There is plenty of science to dispute the global warming fears, too. Lets have some critical thinking.
 
   / Electric Cars: Chev Bolt seems to be the first practical one. #187  
Every station wagon and SUV I've owned had a fold-forward rear seat cushion. (Then rear seatbacks that folded forward to meet that folded cushion).

I saw these Bolt seats had a full 'skirt' to the floor like a sedan with no place for a hinge. I asked and the sales rep verified that the bases are fixed, only the seatbacks fold.
I believe the battery pack actually makes its way up under the seats the seats do however fold flat to the rear cargo shelf
 
   / Electric Cars: Chev Bolt seems to be the first practical one.
  • Thread Starter
#188  
I believe the battery pack actually makes its way up under the seats the seats do however fold flat to the rear cargo shelf
Loading say an ice chest in through the side door, is there a surface there to set it on? Or would I need to add some sort of platform to use the space clear up to the front seatbacks?
 
   / Electric Cars: Chev Bolt seems to be the first practical one. #189  
Interesting thread. I actually read it all.....

I'm an engineer, and an electric car intrigues me. Part of me wants one, but they're just "not there", IMO.

I can get a honda accord cvt that gets 45+mpg. The payoff for a hybrid sure isn't there. I sure can't see that electric is either. It has to be subsidized, which pretty obviously shows that the economics aren't there. Its interesting that the economics are there for some and not others, as if the prices are any different.

The maintenance free.......boy, I dunno about that either. I have a Civic with 173,xxx on it. I have hardly done jack to that car. Sure, I've done the front brakes....ONCE. An electric has a braking system too, even if they're used less. How much less than 80K+ do you want? I've done rear shocks, but electrics have those too. There's an awful lot of car that *isn't* the engine that needs maintenance eventually.

Regen braking....Actually, hydraulics are a *great* solution. To a degree, a flywheel or PTO mounted pump/motor. It pressurizes to a tank, then releases back through the motor. Busses, garbage trucks, UPS, Fedex etc. are the biggest gains. To this point, it's entertaining to put all this time/money/effort into such small gains. So I can get 50 in my prius instead of 45 in a "normal car". Why not put the effort into fleet vehicles, which run more often, more miles, with higher gains. If I can get that city bus from 1 mpg to 3 mpg over it's half million mile life...

Along the same lines, in Ludington, MI there is one of the biggest batteries I'm aware of. Water pumped from lake MI to a reservoir during the night, and makes power during the day going back down. Ludington pumped storage....
Ludington Pumped Storage Plant Increases Efficiency to Provide Greater Grid Support

Saw a thing on PBS about "normal" solutions to energy problems. There was a modified AC unit that made huge tubs of ice at night, then barely used any energy all day long. If there's cheaper power at night, these kinds of things happen all by themselves. If that AC is more efficient, it, as a whole, frees up "fuel" of some sort for uses elsewhere.

I think you guyz'z troll claims for someone actively disagreeing isn't particularly fair. Some comments were troll, to me. But certainly not all. I don't doubt for a second that "reliability issues" could be overlooked by "the media". Not a conspiracy, but not the narrative that's desired. "the media" can dismiss them, just like the collective participants of this thread did (think about it). There is plenty of science to dispute the global warming fears, too. Lets have some critical thinking.

1) I would agree that the cheapest car to operate today is still a barebones Honda Civic or Toyota Corolla or Mazda 3 or similar Hyundai, Kai, Subaru etc. These are very mature products and extremely reliable so maintenance costs are minimal and if something does go wrong there are so many of them out there that parts and repair costs are cheap. If a ICE powered version of one of these cars gets 35mpg (realistic) on the highway and 27-28 in town, then depending on the type of driving you do your average MPG will be slightly north of 30. If you drive 15K per year you'll use 500 gallons of gas, roughly $1300 at today's prices. A hybrid will cost at least a few thousand more to buy and will get 45mpg in the city and on the highway. Maybe a touch more. That same 15K miles will use 300 gallons of gas costing about $800. Fuel savings of about $500/yr will take 5-10 years to recover. Not a particularly good ROI. Of course things change when gas costs $4/gallon. Also, while the hybrids are reliable, they add an extra high cost maintenance concern as local garages cannot work on the hybrid system so you are stuck with dealer service if such service is needed.

2) Use of AC and heat affects true electric car range significantly. Not such a problem for the hybrids.

3) There is very little good science that "disputes" global warming "fears". There is still much to learn about global warming but that is very different from "disputing" it. When 97% of relevant scientists agree on something there is little reason for non scientists to run around "doubting" their conclusions. There are however a lot of politically motivated pseudoscientists and just plain old knownothings who like to dispute science they are not at all prepared to understand.
 
   / Electric Cars: Chev Bolt seems to be the first practical one. #190  
There is very little good science that "disputes" global warming "fears". There is still much to learn about global warming but that is very different from "disputing" it. When 97% of relevant scientists agree on something there is little reason for non scientists to run around "doubting" their conclusions. There are however a lot of politically motivated pseudoscientists and just plain old knownothings who like to dispute science they are not at all prepared to understand.

It only takes an inkling of reasonable doubt IMO...The issue has never been about how many scientists say this or say that...the entire debate is about the data and how it has been manipulated by the AGW choir...
Every change in the way data is collected/regarded over the last decade has been done so to make it appear warmer.
And BTW...the AGW side of the issue is by far the most politically motivated...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2023 John Deere HD40F Draper Head (A53342)
2023 John Deere...
2025 New/Unused LandHonor Massage Chair Sofa (A51573)
2025 New/Unused...
2018  FREIGHTLINER M2 26FT NON CDL BOX TRUCK (A52576)
2018 FREIGHTLINER...
Ingersoll Rand TS5 80 Gallon Air Compressor (A51573)
Ingersoll Rand TS5...
2016 John Deere 35G Mini Excavator (A52377)
2016 John Deere...
2005 CATERPILLAR D3G LGP CRAWLER DOZER (A51246)
2005 CATERPILLAR...
 
Top