Interesting thread. I actually read it all.....
I'm an engineer, and an electric car intrigues me. Part of me wants one, but they're just "not there", IMO.
I can get a honda accord cvt that gets 45+mpg. The payoff for a hybrid sure isn't there. I sure can't see that electric is either. It has to be subsidized, which pretty obviously shows that the economics aren't there. Its interesting that the economics are there for some and not others, as if the prices are any different.
The maintenance free.......boy, I dunno about that either. I have a Civic with 173,xxx on it. I have hardly done jack to that car. Sure, I've done the front brakes....ONCE. An electric has a braking system too, even if they're used less. How much less than 80K+ do you want? I've done rear shocks, but electrics have those too. There's an awful lot of car that *isn't* the engine that needs maintenance eventually.
Regen braking....Actually, hydraulics are a *great* solution. To a degree, a flywheel or PTO mounted pump/motor. It pressurizes to a tank, then releases back through the motor. Busses, garbage trucks, UPS, Fedex etc. are the biggest gains. To this point, it's entertaining to put all this time/money/effort into such small gains. So I can get 50 in my prius instead of 45 in a "normal car". Why not put the effort into fleet vehicles, which run more often, more miles, with higher gains. If I can get that city bus from 1 mpg to 3 mpg over it's half million mile life...
Along the same lines, in Ludington, MI there is one of the biggest batteries I'm aware of. Water pumped from lake MI to a reservoir during the night, and makes power during the day going back down. Ludington pumped storage....
Ludington Pumped Storage Plant Increases Efficiency to Provide Greater Grid Support
Saw a thing on PBS about "normal" solutions to energy problems. There was a modified AC unit that made huge tubs of ice at night, then barely used any energy all day long. If there's cheaper power at night, these kinds of things happen all by themselves. If that AC is more efficient, it, as a whole, frees up "fuel" of some sort for uses elsewhere.
I think you guyz'z troll claims for someone actively disagreeing isn't particularly fair. Some comments were troll, to me. But certainly not all. I don't doubt for a second that "reliability issues" could be overlooked by "the media". Not a conspiracy, but not the narrative that's desired. "the media" can dismiss them, just like the collective participants of this thread did (think about it). There is plenty of science to dispute the global warming fears, too. Lets have some critical thinking.