Look fellas... in all seriousness, I'm pro-hunting, pro-trapping, pro-fishing, pro-farming, etc... It just makes little to no sense to me to put out food to attract animals that you do like, and then shoot the ones that you don't like. If you were protecting a crop from predation, I can understand that. If you were baiting animals to shoot them for their fur, I can understand that. If you're trapping animals for fur, food, whatever, I can understand that. Just dropping food on the ground, and shooting the animals that you don't like, and wasting that resource, and creating all the problems associated with feeding wildlife... that's poor stewardship. And deep-down, you all know that.
There's better solutions that would allow you to harvest or observe nice deer, turkeys, quail, rabbits, ducks, whatever you're into, than feeding from feeders, and at the same time, lowering the racoon population. If you have no room to plant food for wildlife, then you have no wildlife habitat on your place, either. So what's the reason for feeding them, if there's no place for them to live? I think it would be a lot more rewarding to build up and/or enhance wildlife habitat and harvest or observe from that than it would be from feeders and all the problems associated with them. Also, in concentrating deer around feeders, you raise the risk of spreading disease to the very animals you are feeding, such as CWD, bovine TB, acidic conditions in their gut, aflatoxins, and other infectious diseases . That's why so many states are discouraging, or banning altogether, the feeding of deer.
Here's some links. Read and understand the negatives of feeding deer.
https://www.alabamawildlife.org/uploadedFiles/Deer Management Issues.pdf
Chronic Wasting Disease
https://www.in.gov/dnr/fishwild/files/fw-feeding_deer.pdf
Meeting on fatal deer disease set in Corydon | Local News | dailyiowegian.com