Kubota subcompacts are no longer the obvious king of the subcompact hill.

   / Kubota subcompacts are no longer the obvious king of the subcompact hill. #41  
I wish you would call the only Kubota dealer near me here in NM (at least 300 mile radius) and tell them to be competitive.

You have two within 75 miles according to the dealer locator. Different world over here. Within a two hour drive of me you could probably hit a 12-15 Kubota dealers. As you can guess the pricing pressure is a weeeee bit different.
 
   / Kubota subcompacts are no longer the obvious king of the subcompact hill. #42  
This discussion is getting to be more like the direct feature comparison discussions.....dealer dealer dealer.....location location location.
A lot of good machines out there. Get the one with a nearby dealer you like and enjoy the power of having something that lets you do far bigger projects than you ever could by hand.....;)))
 
   / Kubota subcompacts are no longer the obvious king of the subcompact hill.
  • Thread Starter
#43  
As a dealer, Kubota has never been in a better position competitively now as we are with the BX80. We've just got a whole ton of features with very useful benefits for like a $200 price increase. The fit and polish on the current product is fantastic, and the lead on the other tractors in the market is as obvious as its ever been.

A note started this thread about Kubota 'heavy discounting' with the $99-129\mo pricing on BX. Kubota did not cut pricing to do this, no extra discounts where used. Its a combination of a 0/84 rate that's not often used, and putting a lid on dealer margin. The margin left is fairly typical for a place like us, but its tight for some dealers who maybe in high-cost states. The only reactive thing I can think of was the bump in warranty from several years ago.

Greetings Fellow TBNers,

How many of you thought Messick's post was a great response to my original posts ? Come on now - be honest.

Lets be clear - Messick's is a great operation from everything I've been told - and he's a very skilled and valued poster by me and others. But look at what he said compared to the start of this thread and you'll see he is indeed a very skilled poster. He writes and states "As a dealer". But that wasn't what my posts were about was it LOL. My posts were and have been in this thread about Kubota's actions - not dealer's actions. Obviously Messick's is very good at communications :)

My point is that Kubota is doing some things this last 6 months that it has not done before to attempt to maintain its marketshare for the BX product line. And I provided some quite specific examples (free deck and $99 a month and on larger units $129 per month).

Now lets look at what Messick actually stated from his dealer's perspective: "Kubota did not cut pricing to do this, no extra discounts where used. Its a combination of a 0/84 rate that's not often used, and putting a lid on dealer margin." I understood that based on the 84 month extended financing - but if you note - Messick didn't reference the free 54 inch deck in that statement - now did he . . . told you - he's a good salesman :)

In other words Kubota has controlled and reduced dealer's profit potential (mandatory) relating to the BX product. And then of course in addition there is the free deck so dealer's aren't getting any profit on the deck either - seems like some serious discounting to many dealer's bottom line - at least sounds like it to me LOL

Messick also said "The margin left is fairly typical for a place like us, but its tight for some dealers who maybe in high-cost states." Tight ??? Good salesman that Messick LOL.

That comment didn't include the free deck - as I read it. So what about all the Kubota dealers that aren't as large, successful, established, and has the area prospect quantity that Messick's has ? Or has a long lengthy client list from many years when margins were handsome ?

In other words - I'd guess lots of dealer's might say Kubota has "done something" to try to maintain its marketshare - and that its been done to the dealer's bottom line.

1. This thread started with me making a post about marketshare recovery efforts by Kubota because the rest of the scut market is getting much more competitive than they previously were.

2. Then some wanted to post about Massey tractors because I bought a Massey scut - but that wasn't what my posts are or were targeted about.

3. Then some wanted to talk about sales numbers - but my posts weren't about sales numbers but about marketshare - which are 2 totally different things when a market has expanded greatly as the scut market has.


Messick made a great post about how Kubota has improved the BX products - and you'll note my posts had previously said that - Kubota makes fine product.

And his perspective as a highly successful dealer perspective is probably much like my dealer's thinking too - as they are also one of the successful larger dealers in the country. But Messick freely admits a fact that likely many other dealers don't "feel" - a forced mandatory decline in BX profit margin levels because of the 84 month pre-quoted pricings - and a generous free deck worth - what - $2,000 ??? besides ?

4. My point is - why is it so hard for readers to recognize that the competition in the scut field is having an impact. Comments like "I'll still buy a Kubota because its well recognized and has been a good product" - - - has anyone questioned or doubted that at any point prior ? Has anyone said "don't buy a Kubota" ???? Has anyone said "xxxx brand is superior to a Kubota BX scut" in this thread ???

Why am I sticking to this thread - and defending the points I initially made ? Because too often TBNer's seem to reference past history in the process of others choosing for the future. Or too often - TBNer's reference poor dealers or even more often - a lack of available dealers close to them - and my point is - if you see a manufacturer or manufacturers making it harder on small dealers to start or to thrive in various areas - you often create dealers fighting for every dollar they can get to stay in business and feed their families. Lots of dealers can't be a Messick's or a Mc Farlane's or 20 other dealers - because their territory or financial capacity can't compare.

I'd love to have some come back with insights or information or perspectives that counter mine. Am I picking on Messick's? Absolutely not - I respect them - and I respect their salesmanship skills too - to reference the dealer perspective that they have.

But, but, but - for everyone who says "yes that Messicks knows what they are talking about and showed AxleHub the truth - you better understand that Kubota is openly making efforts to keep their considerable scut marketshare - even at the point of impacting the dealers in less than pleasant ways - because Kubota wouldn't do it if they were not competing against a growing group of joint competitor impact.

And no - not just Massey or J.D. or Kioti, - its every brand you can name that makes scuts - its the total of the group - not the individual of the group.

I'm not familiar with what the conditions are to get those special financing rates AND get a free deck or what that free deck is normally sold for.

This is much different than when Kubota lengthened the warranty period a couple years ago because Kubta (the company) bit the bullet on doing that.

jmho
 
Last edited:
   / Kubota subcompacts are no longer the obvious king of the subcompact hill.
  • Thread Starter
#44  
This discussion is getting to be more like the direct feature comparison discussions.....dealer dealer dealer.....location location location.
A lot of good machines out there. Get the one with a nearby dealer you like and enjoy the power of having something that lets you do far bigger projects than you ever could by hand.....;)))

I think the discussion has gotten much more interesting and informative than the standard comparison posts. Its noticing efforts and changes in the industry (specifically SCUT category in this thread) to not a reduction in prospective buyers - but a change in how the marketshare mix is effecting manufacturer efforts and how that trickles down to the dealers. Maybe there are some good reasons why dealers aren't nearly as excited by new prospect inquiries in "what's on special" LOL Maybe many small dealers are being forced into situations they don't like or can't afford.

jmho
 
   / Kubota subcompacts are no longer the obvious king of the subcompact hill. #45  
Axlehub - I think your thread title has garnered the reaction - and I repeat my question: If Kubota subcompacts are no longer the obvious king of the subcompact hill, then which brand is even close to usurping the crown?

For any particular individual need or purpose, there may be a suitable alternative to a Kubota SCUT. More entries into the category will normally dilute market share. Kubota is still the dominate player in the market. I believe they wish to stay on top, and so they adjust their marketing to react to market realities. It's hard to be competitive if you ignore your competitors.

If this thread was titled "Kubota must be feeling pressure in the SCUT marketplace", I think you would have generated less reaction....but that wasn't your intent, was it?
 
   / Kubota subcompacts are no longer the obvious king of the subcompact hill. #46  
So this whole thread is just a rant about your opinion that somehow kubota is failing. No facts, but since they are advertising they are failing.

Show me on this doll where kubota hurt you
<smh>
 
   / Kubota subcompacts are no longer the obvious king of the subcompact hill. #47  
So, I've bought 3 Kubota's. I'll say this simply; they have run quarterly sales incentives for the better part of a decade that I have been following them. Most often, they have been running up to $1,500 toward implements during that period and zero percent for 60 months for the better part of that period. The mower deck is probably the #1 implement people buy along with the loader when trying to get the $1,500. My guess is they overproduced the 54" decks because most everybody buys the 60" and they figured a good way to move that inventory is to "give" a free mower deck with purchase instead of the $1,500 off implement rebate.

Saying that, I have not personally seen 84 months with zero percent, so that is new to me.

Often times, tractors are expensive purchases in relation to a lawn mower or renting or paying someone to do something that you'd like to do for yourself, so maybe that is to entice a new market segment of owners that historically haven't purchased SCUTs, or that person who can't afford $330 per month but could make $250 per month justifiable for a new tractor purchase instead buying of a 2008 BX 2200 with 1,300 hours still selling for $12k with loader and mower deck.

Maybe not either, but in my experience, I'm just not seeing things the same way you are around my area. There is competition in this market and has been for years, but most folks I know with a SCUT are driving a BX.

Don't take that as me putting down your choice. You made the choice that was right for you.

Personally, I looked at New Holland, Cub/Yanmar, Massey, Deere, Kioti, and Kubota. Kioti looked like good tractor, but dealer tried to tell me what I wanted instead listening to me and making recommendations. Deere was ridiculously priced and I didn't like the plastic or any of the dealers and had had so many issues with my Box Store Deere lawnmower, that I wasn't about to give that kind of money to be in some exclusive club. New Holland was as high as anyone and I didn't know anyone that owned one personally and the dealer would have ordered my tractor when I signed the deal. The Massey on the Massey dealer's lot had sat there so long it was faded bad and the dealer wanted full MSRP, so it didn't get a second look from me (at that time; have looked at new ones very recently at the new dealer before I bought my BX2380). My decision came down to my two personal favorites; the Cub/Yanmar and the Kubota. Cub/Yanmar had good value, but were brand new distributor deal and I was worried about the longevity of dealer support. The Kubota dealer was my favorite and I felt like it was a great value. I chose the Kubota and have been happy with my choice (and subsequent choices).
 
   / Kubota subcompacts are no longer the obvious king of the subcompact hill. #48  
Other than Messick's response, this thread is full of conjecture. Popularity for any given reason equates to more sales volumes. Sales volumes contribute to market share and market share leader equates to king of the hill.
 
   / Kubota subcompacts are no longer the obvious king of the subcompact hill. #49  
So this whole thread is just a rant about your opinion that somehow kubota is failing. No facts, but since they are advertising they are failing.

Show me on this doll where kubota hurt you
Ditto.

As someone else pointed out, this isnt your first attempt at this nonsense.

Who leads in marketshare? And quote source of info.

How does one become marketshare leader without being sales leader? (nobody gives these things away)

And no free decks being offered at dealers here, maybe that's your dealers doing.

To me, this thread is about self justification of the tractor you bought.
 
   / Kubota subcompacts are no longer the obvious king of the subcompact hill.
  • Thread Starter
#50  
Axlehub - I think your thread title has garnered the reaction - and I repeat my question: If Kubota subcompacts are no longer the obvious king of the subcompact hill, then which brand is even close to usurping the crown?

. . .

If this thread was titled "Kubota must be feeling pressure in the SCUT marketplace", I think you would have generated less reaction....but that wasn't your intent, was it?

Teachu2, I think you are probably correct. While Kubota BX is still the obvious most dominant seller in the scut market - its not at the same marketshare it was years ago when it had 90% or 80% of the market share for scut units. My point is - Kubota is doing things like it never has done before in the history of my following them. To me - that means its marketshare is clearly not the 90 or 80 percent numbers it was. In some industries - owning 40% of the marketshare is a highly dominant goal - but not when you invent the category as Kubota did. My intent was to get prospects and new buyers to recognize that there are reasons for more than one brand in the marketplace of scuts - and it isn't about color LOL

jmho
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2003 Chevrolet 3500 (A50120)
2003 Chevrolet...
2017 POLARIS RANGER 500 EFI UTV (A51247)
2017 POLARIS...
2013 MACK CXU (A52472)
2013 MACK CXU (A52472)
2015 FREIGHTLINER CASCADIA DAYCAB (A52472)
2015 FREIGHTLINER...
2006 Ford Fusion SE Sedan (A51694)
2006 Ford Fusion...
2020 KUBOTA RTV X1100C UTV (A51406)
2020 KUBOTA RTV...
 
Top