k0ua
Epic Contributor
Is that hydrostatic or IVT? I thought everything over 100hp was IVT, but I am sure no transmission expert.
Hydrostatic is easy to use, foot treadles eliminate need to use left arm/hand on reverser. Don't understand why someone hasn't
come up with hydro functionality and high efficiency too. The transmissions in our cars and trucks have become super efficient, up to 10 speeds now. But we seem stuck at a three speed hydro. 3 speeds work nicely for me, btw. I use all three, from tilling and loader work to running down the road in high. Now if they could shut up the whine...……..
Yes, heavy equipment has hydros all over the place and the really heavy stuff now seems to be going diesel electric.
But to the best of my knowledge, JD at 66hp(is it up to 70 now?) in a four series is the most you can get.
Why not a hydro option in a 5? Or a Kubota M?
I have a "one speed" variable hydro on my 1968 Cub Cadet. They've come a long way...
Daugen, the number of "ranges" or "speeds" have nothing to do with the effeciency of the hydro units. Remember the range selector is nothing but a simple non syncronized gear transmission behind the hydro unit. It is not really a part of the hydrostatic transmission, it is just a simple gear transmission for speed/torque adjustment to suit the job and the terrain.
As you know some hydro transmissions are used in heavy equipment where needed. But as the power goes up and the machine gets heavier, the inherent inefficiency of the hydro unit start to add up and the fact that you need higher and higher pressures in the hydro unit for bigger machines adds cost and complexity.
Hydros are great and I sure love mine, but the way we small tractor lovers use our tractors we can spend a few more dollars each year for extra fuel to enjoy all the wonderful characteristics that a hydro brings to the table, But if you are pulling a plow around a field all day with a large tractor the loss of efficiency starts to subtract from the bottom line of the harvest.