jdom84
Gold Member
Richard
I understand. It took me a year of full time study to get a background knowledge of the issues and then a 6 hour lecture by one of the top building science professors of our time to congeal it into gut level understanding. I then spent a year developing the ways to overcome the challenges with cost effective strategies and about another 2-3 years before all my buildings were transitioned to the new system. I refused to implement any methods that were not economically viable even though the budgets of my buildings could sustain methods that are not able to be strictly economically justified. As I have said before, this is a big subject and it can't really be covered in posts on a tractor forum but I will say this;
2" polyisocyanurate foam board which is one of the exterior insulations I use is around 65 cents per square foot. That is more than fiberglass but less than spray foam. As a part of an overall system, it can be done for a very reasonable cost. The measures we currently use to air tighten and insulate buildings are mostly a hodge podge of whackamole where we address each problem that is created by applying one more layer of sealing technique or strategy. The things I no longer need to pay for on my buildings include, sealing at the plate line, sealing wire penetrations, weatherstripping and insulating attic access, IC rated recessed cans, sealing recessed cans to the drywall, sealing and gasketing electrical boxes, attic ventilation and other things. The biggest benefit however is that there is no safer way to build a building from a durability and indoor air quality standpoint and the cost of no failures can't be overstated.
But I get it. There is a lot of new info to digest and it takes time. Just take your time and if you are interested dig a little deeper as time allows. What matters isn't knowing what product to use where. What matters is to understand the forces at play and how they affect our buildings. After that, the rest becomes clear. I must admit that I would have gotten to a better understanding sooner if I had ignored products and strategies when I first started trying to learn about this and focused on the basic science instead. The implications of the Second Law are the key. Enjoy the journey.
Ray,
I think you just might be my hero! Our next house is going to be built similar to how you have described in some of your earlier post. I wish I had a fraction of the knowledge and experience you do on this subject but I have been following the airtight movement in Europe for a while now and have been fascinated by the technology! However, every builder I have talked to locally will not build an "airtight" building with exterior insulation because they either say it cant be done or its all wrong.
Our current house sits on top a "new" (15 years old now) basement made from ICF's (insulated concrete forms), with foam under the slabs and radiant heat in the slab. The first level of the house was built in the 50's and when the local college expanded, the house was moved to its current location, fully intact. When we first purchased the house (2 more owners later), it needed major remodeling in the older section and so we moved into the basement. After spending a couple years in the extremely well insulated basement, it was evident that controlling air flow and insulating in the proper places makes all the difference in how a building maintains temperatures and uses energy. BUT without doing to much research we replaced all the windows decided on spray foam for the upper level so the insulation would "match" that of the basement. A year later all the walls were back up and the inside of the house remodel was completely finished. We left the attic with standard blow in because the house does not have a ERVS (energy recovery ventilation system) and would have been very hard and expensive to install... Then set our sights to re-siding and re-roofing the house. But now that its all done and I am a bit more educated in the "smarter" way to insulate a house, I realize that I should not have torn out all the walls of house and I should have just resided with insulation under the siding and roof. However, our windows already turn to sheets of ice every winter which forces us to leave the shades open at the top and bottom. But had I done the outside insulation air tight shell, I would have needed the ERVS for sure.
Now that we have spent few years in the "finished" house, There is differently a noticeable difference... but could it have been better? I am not upset about the doing the spray foam though. It has added a rigidity and soundness to the house which wasn't there before, you can hardly tell when the wind is gusting outside now (40-50 mph). Our summers can reach 100+ degrees and the house will stay in the 70's, with no AC installed as long as you open all the windows at night to cool it back down to 60's. From spring to fall, we use $50 a month in natural gas and $120 in the dead of winter ( Nov - Mar ) to heat the 2500 sqft house (and DHW) with temps down to -20... Where as before it was nearly $300+/- per month from Sep - May but we also replaced our boiler and water heater with a 95% efficient ones. It may not be the most economical way to insulate a house but it needed remodel anyways and we only spent $2500 for all the spray foam work (not counting my time to tear out and replace all the Sheetrock.)
I will certainly take what I have learned here and apply it to my next place.
I am curious to know what your thoughts are on SIPs? It seems you can achieve a well insulated and airtight house very quickly this way.