I don't know that there is anything wrong with them. They just sort of got left behind when Kubota brought out the
M59 at the end of the
l48 model run. And the
M59 has a lot more features. But that doesn't make the
L48 a bad machine. It's got pretty much the same engine as the
M59 but without the turbo, and a similar transmission but without the addition of the two-speed electo/hydraulic split shifter kind of rear axle. The
M59 is just a tiny bit larger and has more hydraulic capability.
We bought our
M59 iin 2008, and the
l48 was one we considered. There was even one on the lot for about 45K. I ran it and it seemed fine. But the
M59 was 52K and clearly a step up in lots of ways & had 5 years 0% financing. I ran the
l48 and frankly might have gotten it except I'm a fairly large guy with big feet and couldn't spin the seat around backwards to the backhoe position without standing up and half stepping off the tractor. That probably wasn't a big deal, but my wife had her eye set on the
M59. So I did the wise thing and didn't argue. Today she loves "her"
M59 and is proud she chose it. Who would want to change that?
But if I saw a good
L39 or
L48 I wouldn't hesitate. The
L39 are pricy because their size is just so darn handy and they are really overbuilt. So maybe the
L48 was sort of caught in the middle between two more popular models. I don't hear any problems, though. Maybe someone else knows more.
Check out that old 60 page TBN post on M59s?? There was one guy who had an
L48 & posted a lot then.
I'll look and see if I have some
L48 literature.
I think the
L48 will be a great play machine (for me).
Two weeks ago I bought a 2006 model, from an original owner, with 250 total hours.
32K....not cheap, but exceptionally low time.
4 remotes, hydraulic QA loader bucket pins, backhoe QA bucket.
Looks new, except for some areas of fading paint.
Needs seat repair.
I will give it a partial repaint.