Take note that different manufacturers take and measure the loaders lift capacity from different points. They all don稚 measure the capacities the same way.
Let's Talk: Loader LIES! How specifications can be manipulated. - YouTube
I find it a little ironic when companies make marketing videos, bad-mouthing other companies marketing videos ... (You'll notice, in the entire video they never quote any actual number. Why do you think that is?)
I don't want to start an entirely new debate here, but for the sake of clarity, lets make an objective comparison.
I got the loader lift curve for the
L3560 LA 805. I extracted the data and changed the units from mm and Kg to in and lb. Next, I plotted the maximum lift capacity at the corresponding height for the tractors I'm looking at, plotted as an "x", in red, blue, and black, for the LS XR3140, LS XR4140, and TYM T474, respectively. Note, all capacities are at the pivot pin. While measuring it at 500 mm forward would give a more realistic "real world" number, we are comparing apples-to-apples by looking at all at the pivot pin.
With that information, we can simply look at what the LA805 loader will lift at the corresponding height in comparison to what the other loaders lift.
See the attached plot. As shown:
At 92.6 in, the LS XR 3140 (which is a frame size smaller than the Kubota) lifts 2178 lb vs ~1790 lb (18% more)
In similar frame sizes, the TYM T474 lifts 2152 lb vs ~1690 lb (27% more), and the LS XR4140 lifts 2713 lb vs 1750 lb (55% more)
So, yeah. I don't care what the internet says. When you look at the cold hard numbers, Kubota loaders are incredibly weak. They do lift higher, than most others, and if that is important to you, fine. I'm interested in total capacity, and so that is a major strike against Kubota.
