lilranch2001
Super Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2009
- Messages
- 9,015
- Tractor
- Bobcat CT 235
Op says "primary uses are snowblowing (90+inches per year) " means a cab unit is a must
I do not think MG read the OPS full post
Op says "primary uses are snowblowing (90+inches per year) " means a cab unit is a must
What's your max budget?I think a tracked skid steer would be ideal, and have peripherally considered that, but the cost is just too prohibitive.
I've owned both.I'd rather buy a tractor made in Japan, than India, South Korea, or China, that's for sure!.. also, no Cast Steel frame!. formed Steel all the way!..
We tend to "grow" rocks where I live. You can't dig a shovel in the ground without hitting one. They vary in size from football to car size. In my woods, they are just sitting all over. I'd like to be able to go in, get them out, and use them to build up some retaining walls. This is one reason lift capacity (and wide tires with ballast) is important to me.
As an example, here are some pictures in my woods.View attachment 616305View attachment 616306
Implements and all, 45k, including taxes. I'd really like to stay well below that, though. My plan for implements was forks, a box blade, snowblower, and grapple.What's your max budget?
Kubota is the only one I've been able to get a curve for, so far.What I dont see in your post is the curves for the LS tractors (at pin and 500 mm forward). Did you find those as well? Just curious. It looks like you only have a curve for the Kubota?
Also I would restate your comment as “Kubota loaders in this class are weak”.


See post 29. It's easy and straightforward to compare loader lift capacities at the pivot pins between the various models.So some rough math to get an estimate at 500mm.
2718 lb at the pin. From the diagram in the LL4104 manual, the pin is roughly 5ft in front of the center of the front axle, so 2718 lb * 5 ft is 13590 lb*ft of torque at the front axle.
Now, 500mm is just under 20 in, so add that to 5 ft and you get 80 in, or 6 2/3 ft.
13590 lb*ft / 6 2/3 ft gives us 2038.5 lbs at 500mm from the pin.
Comparing that to the Kubota LA805 loader option on the L3560, the stouter of the two shown in the manual I found, at 1715 lbs at the pin and 1290 lbs at 500 mm forward.
All that being said, the Kubota lifts higher and all these numbers are at max height, so if you were to lower the Kubota to the height of the LS, it could be closer. I'd have to break out the old statics book to do that, and I'm not that interested haha! Hope I helped!
Manual page screen shots attached. View attachment 616371View attachment 616372
I guess my thought is, why step up to the L4060 and pay and extra $10k, instead of just getting an LS or TYM.The 3560 loader IS anemic. If you step up to a 4060 you can get a much more capable loader.