Did the Covid shot make you cranky?

[/pine]

LoL...It seems to me that there is a psychological factor effecting some of those that have been vaccinated...

It's getting to the point where everyone that is caterwauling about those that are shunning the vaccine are becoming obnoxious...It's like they got the vaccine and now they want to make sure everyone else gets it because should down the road a problem crops up with the vaccines after so much time they want everyone to be in the same boat as them...

I hate to tell all the mask nazis out there but I hope you realize the recent relaxations by the CDC prove how wrong you were...Now the mask nazis and the CDC continue to wear masks if only to hide the egg on their faces...!

 

[ruffdog]

Name calling now? People are either part of the problem or part of the solution.

 

[lman]

I have a job now in which I make random visits with offenders on home detention and do random instant drug screens. Last week I visited and tested an individual that tested positive for Methamphetamine. As I was taking him to jail for the violation, he asked about COVID in the jail and I asked him if he had been vaccinated. He then said that he didn't want to get vaccinated because the vaccination had not been thoroughly tested and he didn't want it put in his body. I laughed at him and pointed out the poisons that he puts in his body while consuming Meth. He then admitted that his logic was flawed.

I chuckle when I hear people saying they won't get vaccinated because it may be dangerous when they have probably done things that are far more dangerous at some point in time with far less benefit.

 

[Citydude]

I guess people in Wyoming are afraid to travel. Do you have your Yellow Fever vaccination certificate? If not, you are not getting an entry visa for over a dozen countries. If you want to hide from disease, that's your business. The rest of us are not willing to voluntarily surrender our freedom.

Keep drinking the koolaid. LOL

 

[/pine]

Name calling now? People are either part of the problem or part of the solution.

Describing a social stance is not name calling it's a description of behavior...

 

[MossRoad]

Godwin's law, short for Godwin's law (or rule) of **** analogies,[1][2] is an Internet adage asserting that as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or ****** becomes more likely.[2][3] That is, if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will compare someone or something to Adolf ****** or his deeds, the point at which usually dampens discussion.

Promulgated by the American attorney and author Mike Godwin in 1990,[2] Godwin's law originally referred specifically to Usenet newsgroupdiscussions.[4] He stated that he introduced Godwin's law in 1990 as an experiment in memetics.[2] It is now applied to any threaded online discussion, such as Internet forums, chat rooms, and comment threads, as well as to speeches, articles, and other rhetoric[5][6] where reductio ad Hitlerum occurs.

In 2012, "Godwin's law" became an entry in the third edition of the Oxford English Dictionary.[7]

 

[/pine]

There's quite a difference between making a direct comparison and simply describing someone's behavior...!
...It's funny that some can't quite comprehend the difference and jump to conclusions trying to apply something that's entirely irrelevant, incompetent and immaterial...!

 

[JethroB]

I’m out of this thread.

 

[stuckmotor]

I’m out of this thread.

When I started the thread, all I wanted to know was, if the covid shot made people other than me cranky. I think I know how sparc feels and why he left Pallets in fields. LOL

 

[Larry Caldwell]

Godwin's law, short for Godwin's law (or rule) of **** analogies,[1][2] is an Internet adage asserting that as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or ****** becomes more likely.[2][3] That is, if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will compare someone or something to Adolf ****** or his deeds, the point at which usually dampens discussion.

Promulgated by the American attorney and author Mike Godwin in 1990,[2] Godwin's law originally referred specifically to Usenet newsgroupdiscussions.[4] He stated that he introduced Godwin's law in 1990 as an experiment in memetics.[2] It is now applied to any threaded online discussion, such as Internet forums, chat rooms, and comment threads, as well as to speeches, articles, and other rhetoric[5][6] where reductio ad Hitlerum occurs.

In 2012, "Godwin's law" became an entry in the third edition of the Oxford English Dictionary.[7]

That made sense 30 years ago, but nowadays we have real Nazis to deal with. That was almost unthinkable in 1990.