The bias is that 100% EV is 'ahead' and less than that is 'behind'. The fact is that Toyota's Prime line (Prius and Rav4 at the moment) are far superior overall to any EV for most uses. An EV is only useful if you are a commuter. Anyone who travels more than about 200 miles at any time would be grossly inconvenienced by an EV. Even the fast charging stations take way too long.
Tomorrow, I am driving our Prius Prime 850 or so miles north to visit my elderly parents. I will need about 12 gallons of gas and no prolonged stops unless we want a break from driving. If I was driving an EV, I would need to stop for a couple of hours 2 or 3 times at a minimum. This would turn my 12.5 hour drive into 16-18 hour marathon. Most likely, it would mean I would need to stay in a hotel along the way, eat more meals out and...wait for it...use more power and a ultimately contribute more total CO2 to the environment than the 12 gallons of gas I will use.
Toyota is trying to slow the EV roll precisely because they are ahead on better alternatives and when the government starts trying to decide what is better in a fluid situation, they tend to make really bad decisions that benefit their constituents or donors rather than the country as a whole.
Sidebar - to those advocating a flat tax...a national sales tax makes more sense. Sales taxes are harder to avoid so everyone pays. Income taxes are only paid by people who make money legally. Don't worry about those who are 'poor'. As a benevolent society, we have programs for those people. Who cares if they pay in sales tax along the way, they will get back many times more than that in government payments. Some of our states with the best state government budgets (liberal and conservative) are among the handful who do not tax incomes. Of course, the only way you get that solution is by amendment to abolish the income tax...wishful thinking.