Back in the '80's, I worked on a hydrogen vehicle platform at GM using a fuel cell to power an electric car. The EV1 was supposed to receive such a cell (joint venture between GM & Cornell University & BMW). But, the State of Kalifornia backed out of an agreement to allow hydrogen fueling stations for these vehicles. A major concern in the design was the 5000 psi hydrogen tank needed to get a decent customer acceptable range out of such a vehicle. (The energy density with carbon based fuels is exceptional, hydrogen, not so great). A fueling station would swap tanks, not fill them. The crash concerns also helped kill it, not from fire (the colorless hydrogen fire quickly goes upward and away from the wreckage unlike gasoline) but from the concussive force of the explosion. This concern was not just for occupants, but for EMS, Fire, and Safety personnel. The goal was to have a small car and a pickup truck running with 4 electric motors. BTW: the State of NY also came up with an idea from the past when horses were scared of cars. The EV's were too quiet, so you had to have a periodic noisemaker to warn pedestrians of your approach.
Anybody notice the new concerns about the high (450) voltage in today's electric cars ? Mercedes has issued a warning/requirement that Safety personnel must wait at least 1 minute after a crash, for the battery and electrical component damage to settle out. If you run into one, don't let anybody lick the terminals.