Can you believe this story?

   / Can you believe this story? #1  

Pixguy

Super Star Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2010
Messages
14,864
Location
By the lake in NH & FL
Tractor
2011 MF 2410 TLB
Read this story and tell me this isn't crazy.

Michigan car owner sued after Jeep kills mechanic during oil change

on edit for those who cannot or won't go on the dastardly Fox News

Don't like my ad blocker. Oh well.
A Michigan man who left his car at a dealership for an oil change and tire rotation is being sued after his vehicle was involved in the death of one of the dealership's employees.

Sergio Enrique Diaz-Navarro took his red 2019 Wrangler to a Chrysler Jeep Dodge dealership on March 13, 2020, and 19-year-old lube technician Daniel Thompson worked on the car. After the service was complete, the vehicle "lurched forward" as the young employee attempted to operate it, crushing 42-year-old mechanic Jeffrey Hawkins against a cabinet, court records show.

Thompson had lowered the Jeep from the vehicle lift, and then tried to start the car and let it idle to ensure there were no oil leaks around the filter, according to court records.

"Thompson reached into the vehicle and pressed brake with his right foot, keeping his other foot on the floor," the plaintiff summary reads. "He pressed the start button. When the vehicle did not start, he took his foot off the brake and depressed the clutch pedal. He again hit the start button. This time the Jeep started. He removed his foot from the clutch, still standing outside the vehicle. The vehicle lurched forward."

Hawkins was taken to the hospital, where he succumbed to his injuries, according to The Kansas City Star.

Attorney David Femminineo, who is representing Hawkins' estate, told FOX 2 that Thompson did not know how to drive the vehicle's manual transmission and did not have a license. The attorney also said the dealership cannot be sued because of a legal standard preventing an employee from suing their boss for negligence, which, in this case, would be the hiring of someone who should not have been driving.

Because the incident happened at work and involved two employees, the boss cannot be sued, FOX 2 notes.

Diaz-Navarro's attorney told FOX 2 he plans to fight the case in a trial later this month.

"When you hand your car over to anybody including the valet or the person at the service desk at your local dealership, you better be able to trust that person," the attorney said.

According to a summary filed in court on March 1, the court has ordered the Rochester Hills Chrysler Jeep Dodge dealership, where the incident occurred, to indemnify Diaz-Navarro if he is found liable of negligence.

"So in reality, the owner is going to be held responsible, but the dealership’s insurance company is paying," Femminineo told McClatchy News. He said he hopes a verdict in excess of $15 million is awarded.
 
Last edited:
   / Can you believe this story? #7  
That story came up in my news feed earlier. I guess they're sueing everyone, hopeing something will stick. It certainly won't do anything but cause a potential hassle for the car owner.
Lawyers are a blight on society, and we all pay for it.
 
   / Can you believe this story? #8  
Read this story and tell me this isn't crazy.

Michigan car owner sued after Jeep kills mechanic during oil change

on edit for those who cannot or won't go on the dastardly Fox News


A Michigan man who left his car at a dealership for an oil change and tire rotation is being sued after his vehicle was involved in the death of one of the dealership's employees.

Sergio Enrique Diaz-Navarro took his red 2019 Wrangler to a Chrysler Jeep Dodge dealership on March 13, 2020, and 19-year-old lube technician Daniel Thompson worked on the car. After the service was complete, the vehicle "lurched forward" as the young employee attempted to operate it, crushing 42-year-old mechanic Jeffrey Hawkins against a cabinet, court records show.

Thompson had lowered the Jeep from the vehicle lift, and then tried to start the car and let it idle to ensure there were no oil leaks around the filter, according to court records.

"Thompson reached into the vehicle and pressed brake with his right foot, keeping his other foot on the floor," the plaintiff summary reads. "He pressed the start button. When the vehicle did not start, he took his foot off the brake and depressed the clutch pedal. He again hit the start button. This time the Jeep started. He removed his foot from the clutch, still standing outside the vehicle. The vehicle lurched forward."

Hawkins was taken to the hospital, where he succumbed to his injuries, according to The Kansas City Star.

Attorney David Femminineo, who is representing Hawkins' estate, told FOX 2 that Thompson did not know how to drive the vehicle's manual transmission and did not have a license. The attorney also said the dealership cannot be sued because of a legal standard preventing an employee from suing their boss for negligence, which, in this case, would be the hiring of someone who should not have been driving.

Because the incident happened at work and involved two employees, the boss cannot be sued, FOX 2 notes.

Diaz-Navarro's attorney told FOX 2 he plans to fight the case in a trial later this month.

"When you hand your car over to anybody including the valet or the person at the service desk at your local dealership, you better be able to trust that person," the attorney said.

According to a summary filed in court on March 1, the court has ordered the Rochester Hills Chrysler Jeep Dodge dealership, where the incident occurred, to indemnify Diaz-Navarro if he is found liable of negligence.

"So in reality, the owner is going to be held responsible, but the dealership’s insurance company is paying," Femminineo told McClatchy News. He said he hopes a verdict in excess of $15 million is awarded.
Guy didn't know how to drive a manual transmission...
No doubt the Jeep was in gear when he let off the clutch
And the own gets sued...utter BS
 
   / Can you believe this story? #9  
Letos law (Youtube.com) did a segment on this. Has to do with strict liability vs workman's comp laws. It's the same liability as if you loaned your car to someone. Although in this case the dealership has to protect the owner.
 
   / Can you believe this story? #10  
It’s not lawyers, it’s judges. This should have been thrown out as soon as it was filed.

Actually it's your state legislation. They set the statutes. Judges just don't fly by the seat of their pants unless they overstep said state statutes.
 
   / Can you believe this story? #11  
The attorney also said the dealership cannot be sued because of a legal standard preventing an employee from suing their boss for negligence, which, in this case, would be the hiring of someone who should not have been driving.

That's why the mechanic's family is going after the car owner. Not because the car owner is to blame, but because of a law written to shield businesses from the results of negligence towards employees.
 
   / Can you believe this story? #12  
It’s not lawyers, it’s judges. This should have been thrown out as soon as it was filed.
It's the whole corrupt system, all about making money. If any money will be awarded to the estate in this case you can bet the lawyers will get the biggest share of it.

No different than in the recent case where a jury found Remington guilty and fined something like 93 million dollars because they made the rifle that was used in a mass shooting. If you read the background to the case, it was not brought by the victims/family of the mass shooting. The lawyers thought they saw a way to make money so they actively sought out family members and talked them into filing the suit. Then they searched through the jury pool until they found enough people who believed the world owed them a living and those jurors found Remington guilty. Now a precedent is set and I'm wondering how long it will be before we see the first lawsuit against a car manufacturer in a case where a drunk driver was killed even though the vehicle was not at fault.

There's no logic to this...but these days, logic seems to be in short supply.
 
   / Can you believe this story? #13  
That's why the mechanic's family is going after the car owner. Not because the car owner is to blame, but because of a law written to shield businesses from the results of negligence towards employees.
Illogical! What did the car owner have to do with it?? So the law shields the business so the lawyer goes after someone who is totally blameless and had nothing to do with what happened? Why not just sue the governor of the state. Makes just as much sense!
 
   / Can you believe this story? #14  
In the end, the jeep owner pays nothing and the dealer covers the cost of a employee killing another employee. Maybe the dealer should have employees that have a license and is trained to drive all vehicles.
 
   / Can you believe this story?
  • Thread Starter
#15  
In the end, the jeep owner pays nothing and the dealer covers the cost of a employee killing another employee. Maybe the dealer should have employees that have a license and is trained to drive all vehicles.
But what will show on his record?
 
   / Can you believe this story? #17  
   / Can you believe this story? #18  
That's why the mechanic's family is going after the car owner. Not because the car owner is to blame, but because of a law written to shield businesses from the results of negligence towards employees.
If I read it correctly, that's the only way the family can get compensation. The Jeep owner's the one getting sued, but the dealership will be who pays. Don't blame the lawyer of the family who is trying to replace their deceased family member's wages; blame the laws which are in place making that necessary.

Edit:It looks like I'm late to the party again, so that's already been pointed out.
 
   / Can you believe this story? #19  
The Automobile Dealers Association is one of the strongest lobby/special interest groups in the US.

There is a huge difference between an individual borrowing your car and a business taking possession of your car as part of the normal course of business. The owner of the Jeep has zero fault here unless he made some modification to the Jeep that was unknown to the dealership.

The fault lies with the employee who did not know how to drive a stick. His pockets are not deep, so lawyers go after the owner to get at the dealership. Moronic laws. The owner will still have to be involved in something for which he did nothing wrong. In this crazy world, he should be able to sue the state for putting the business ahead of the individual. How is the guy going to feel knowing his Jeep killed someone? Smh
 
   / Can you believe this story? #20  
Lawyers become judges. Anyone see a problem here ? LOL
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

500 BBL FRAC TANK (A58214)
500 BBL FRAC TANK...
2016 CATERPILLAR D5K2 XL CRAWLER DOZER (A60429)
2016 CATERPILLAR...
John Deere 4520 (A60462)
John Deere 4520...
2003 Big Tex 10PI 16ft. T/A Pipe Top Utility Trailer (A55973)
2003 Big Tex 10PI...
PALLET OF SCRUBBER PODS (A58214)
PALLET OF SCRUBBER...
John Deere S350 (A60462)
John Deere S350...
 
Top