dstig1
Super Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2010
- Messages
- 5,016
- Location
- W Wisc
- Tractor
- Kubota L5240 HSTC, JD X738 Mower, (Kubota L3130 HST - sold)
First off, I think banning IC engines is a pie in the sky idea, but I also thought five years ago I'd never own a battery tool of any sort, and now I am replacing my Stihl gas powered stuff with battery powered stuff, they work good and are lighter. Did I do it to save the environment? No, I got sick of cleaning out carburetors when I forgot to drain the gas.
I agree that the climate religion folks tend to have a "sky is falling" attitude, however the same could be said for the anti-climate religion folks. The truth is somewhere in between.
I can remember the very first Earth Day, our high school science departments created a room that had the same atmospheric condition of LA smog, us farm boys were encouraged to walk in and see what it was like. Quite honestly, I doubted every thing that I was being told, but overtime a lot of what they said was determined to be true especially about the use of lead in our gasoline.
Facts can change over time as more data is developed. A prime example would be Einstein's theory of relativity, what was accepted as fact for many years is now possibly wrong.
When people start sprouting facts to me, I usually ask them where they're data came from and make up my own mind.
By the way, I gave you a good post earlier because I thought your response was well thought out and well written, it didn't seem to have any personal agenda or attack in it, I enjoy good discussion and like to be challenged.
Even a couple years ago I would have said banning ICE's was pie in the sky also. I am no longer so sure. In neighboring MN, the D's tipped the senate to a very slight majority and kept their also slight majority in the house last fall. Well they are now behaving like they got 90% of the seats and just ramming through all sorts of things that are starting to border on extreme, so this would not surprise me. They already mandated that all electricity must be carbon free by 2040. To blazes with the laws of physics! The overreach is astounding every time this crew gets the slightest majority these days. You saw it in the Federal govt after 2020 too. No compromise, just ramming speed!
So yeah, I am very concerned they are going to do something dumb like this. Often these arguments devolve into screaming matches over one side saying that the other side wants no regulations and to poison the earth and the other side saying the opposite side wants everything to stop. From what I see, the second one is much closer to reality. I refer to the environmentalist crowd as the "No, Nothing, Never" crowd because that is how they approach Every. Single. New Project. First off they say No to it. So you ask them what would be acceptable. The response to that is not compromise but "nothing" will be acceptable. When will they come around? "never". When you oppose absolutely every bit of development all the time, it becomes ridiculous to deal with. The goal appears to be delay and add costs to everything so fewer things can get done. They know that eventually they will lose most of the time, but if they just just stretch it out and make it more costly, then that many fewer things will get done. And this is progress? But that is the mindset here, and it is existentially dangerous to society, IMO.
I will buy and use battery tools as I see fit and as they make sense. Same with Gas tools. You want to win the argument, make better stuff.