GM/Cadillac entering Formula 1

   / GM/Cadillac entering Formula 1 #1  

Renze

Elite Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2003
Messages
4,946
Location
the Steernbos (Holland)
Tractor
Zetor 3011, Zetor 5718
Interesting: Its quite something different than Nascar, that banned OHC engines such as the Ford 427 Cammer in 1967, because they wanted racing engines to resemble the street engines of that era (thereby taking away the incentive for technological development)

In Formula 1, the rules promote that new ideas are tried to win, after which some eventually find their way to consumer vehicles, which is an opposite approach to technology...

 
   / GM/Cadillac entering Formula 1 #2  
I do like F1 and it is interesting how the technology has trickled down over the years. It does get a bit frustrating when one team dominates for a whole season as the engineers and designers can make a larger difference than the drivers, but then you can look at the teams further down the field and see how they are improving their car.
TBH I should watch Indycar more as the racing is closer, but I always seem to watch F1 and that's all.

It will be interesting with a N.A. manufacturer involved although I imagine almost all of the operations and staff will be somewhere around Silverstone in England. The hybrid/turbo F1 engines are among the most thermally efficient and its probably wise for most major car manufacturers to have some idea how this is done.
 
Last edited:
   / GM/Cadillac entering Formula 1
  • Thread Starter
#3  
I do like F1 and it is interesting how the technology has trickled down over the years. It does get a bit frustrating when one team dominates for a whole season as the engineers and designers can make a larger difference than the drivers, but then you can look at the teams further down the field and see how they are improving their car.
Thats why they change the rules so often: when one manufacturer gets too dominant, after 4 or 5 years a new engine configuration becomes mandatory and everyone has a new chance to come out on top.


TBH I should watch Indycar more as the racing is closer, but I always seem to watch F1 and that's all.
Ah, indycar yes... ive played the videogames 30 years ago, but its pretty unknown in Europe. I forgot all about that..

It will be interesting with a N.A. manufacturer involved although I imagine almost all of the operations and staff will be somewhere around Silverstone in England.
Yeah, outsourcing R&D sort of defeats the purpose, as the chance that that knowledge trickles down into the assembly line of the main plant, diminishes...

The hybrid/turbo F1 engines are among the most thermally efficient and its probably wise for most major car manufacturers to have some idea how this is done.
Most manufacturers nowadays offer turbo gasoline engines, although no production vehicle engine revs to 18.000rpm...
 
   / GM/Cadillac entering Formula 1
  • Thread Starter
#4  
Oh, and if you want to watch an ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT documentary (better than the "real life" garbage Discovery broadcasts these days)

The Ford-Cosworth 3 liter DFV V8 dominated the scene for years, untill the FIA also allowed 1.5 liter turbocharged engines.

BMW took their 1960s cast iron 1.5 liter four cylinder production engine block, especially those with 60.000km on them, used in street tests so the cast iron was well aged and stress relieved by repeated heating cycles, and rebuild these engines for racing:
They beefed up the rotating assembly and installed aluminium heads, slapped a turbo to it, and in qualification laps with a blocked wastegate, got 1500hp from it. They were absolutely untouchable.

Ford (Cosworth) tried the same trick with their 1.5 liter Ford Kent based production engine, an engine family thats produced since the 1959 Ford Anglia, and it seized up at around 11.000hrs because of block deformation.... So Cosworth had to develop a purpose built V6 too...

 
Last edited:
   / GM/Cadillac entering Formula 1 #5  
I've worked with the 4 GM 'Key Partner" teams and 1 F1 team before retirement. Believe me, NASCAR is a LOT more difficult an engineering feat because of the weights, undersized tires, horsepower & aero limits and handling traits. F1 cars have remarkable electronic controls that are operated from the pits for engine, chassis, suspension and aero characteristics. The drivers are now basically just coming along for the ride. Ooo, they can still shift gears ! Their tire reserve rating is HUGE plus the use of different tire sizes front/rear. This makes them heavily understeering which is managed by extremely high front aero loadings (5-6 TONS). Team budgets are over a few billion from manufacturers and sponsors. Whereas NASCAR cup cars use different tires left /right and with the desire for high cornering levels set up for slightly oversteering tendencies. This takes some pretty serious vehicle motion sensing. And it's their LEFT side tires which have the high grip numbers in oval track races. What you should find amusing is how open wheel drivers (F1, F2, F3 and Indycar) do poorly in NASCAR, while a few NASCAR drivers have showcased their skills few times in demonstration drive-offs.

BTW: The major objection from the current F1 teams was the addition of one more team which cuts down the winning's division (which is a LOT of money). Cadillac faces a large prejudicial audience whose loyalty is to Mercedes, Ferrari, and Honda. They absolutely hate Michael Andretti, inc. They view GM as a junk iron supplier. But Pratt & Miller has done a great job with Corvette in other series and I have been involved in the CTS racing operations. So, we shall see.
 
   / GM/Cadillac entering Formula 1
  • Thread Starter
#6  
Believe me, NASCAR is a LOT more difficult an engineering feat because of the weights, undersized tires, horsepower & aero limits and handling traits. F1 cars have remarkable electronic controls that are operated from the pits for engine, chassis, suspension and aero characteristics. The drivers are now basically just coming along for the ride. Ooo, they can still shift gears ! Their tire reserve rating is HUGE plus the use of different tire sizes front/rear. This makes them heavily understeering which is managed by extremely high front aero loadings (5-6 TONS).
Sorry, i dont believe you. Engineering a stockcar that takes 900hp from max 5.9 liter at 9000rpm, only makes two identical left hand turns each lap, on banked curves, versus a racecar that takes the same 900hp from 1.5 liter at 18.000+ rpm, and must handle predictably and reliably in left and right hand corners, even chicanes, at speeds between 80 and 350kmh, sometimes on rolling terrain... It just isnt the same.

What you should find amusing is how open wheel drivers (F1, F2, F3 and Indycar) do poorly in NASCAR, while a few NASCAR drivers have showcased their skills few times in demonstration drive-offs.
Last time i checked, there are only two drivers that COMPETED in both Nascar and F1.. And neither were winners in either class.

The only thing that topped F1 was Group B rally, a class abandoned because it was deemed too dangerous. They had 4wd and more power than F1 cars, on dirt roads with spectators on the road.

 
Last edited:
   / GM/Cadillac entering Formula 1 #7  
Too fast to race. The best car video ever made.
 
   / GM/Cadillac entering Formula 1 #8  
Sorry, i dont believe you. Engineering a stockcar that takes 900hp from max 5.9 liter at 9000rpm, only makes two identical left hand turns each lap, on banked curves, versus a racecar that takes the same 900hp from 1.5 liter at 18.000+ rpm, and must handle predictably and reliably in left and right hand corners, even chicanes, at speeds between 80 and 350kmh, sometimes on rolling terrain... It just isnt the same.


Last time i checked, there are only two drivers that COMPETED in both Nascar and F1.. And neither were winners in either class.

The only thing that topped F1 was Group B rally, a class abandoned because it was deemed too dangerous. They had 4wd and more power than F1 cars, on dirt roads with spectators on the road.

I think they run some NASCAR style races in europe, go watch, its not as easy as it looks! While overall, getting around the track by yourself at 90% of race speed is easier in NASCAR, once you have 10-20 competitive cars and drivers, its becomes a contest to see who can find a few hundredths more consistently than the rest, both for car setup and drivers. And with more traffic, no blue flags, its a more of a challenge for a driver to navigate that well too.
In the past when many teams built their own chassis, I bet it would've take even an F1 team a couple years to get consistently near the front of a cup race. I don't know what they are allowed to do now that there is spec chassis, but I imagine there is still lots of setup wizardry that only experience will help with.
 
   / GM/Cadillac entering Formula 1
  • Thread Starter
#9  
I think they run some NASCAR style races in europe, go watch, its not as easy as it looks!

DTM (German series) and BTCC (British seties) is quite like Nascar nowadays, all silhouette racecars, not really stockcars, not even a stock engine block, but all teams race the same cars with a different silhouette on top. Cheaper for the teams, but the series arent as popular as they once were, when true stock cars were raced.

Current 2024 DTM engines are 2 liter turbo fours at around 600hp, restricted to 9000rpm. They weigh around 1000kg.

I think in the 80s it was really stock car racing, with a stock unibody under the Super Touring regulations.


And as you can see in the video with cars cornering on two wheels, stockcar racing is different in Europe: there are no banked corners to keep you on the track, you just have to pray for road contact....
 
Last edited:
   / GM/Cadillac entering Formula 1 #10  
Renze, I believe you need to check again. From memory, Dan Gurney, Mario Andretti, and Juan Pablo Montoya have all competed and won Nascar and F1 races.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

AMCO F42B-3626CS 13ft Pull-Behind Wheel Offset Harrow Tiller (A49461)
AMCO F42B-3626CS...
2018 WACKER NEUSON CORPORATION DBA WACKER NEUSON LTV6 LIGHT TOWER (A50854)
2018 WACKER NEUSON...
12in Backhoe Bucket (A51039)
12in Backhoe...
GENERATOR HOUSE POWERED BY TWIN (60 SERIES)  DETROIT 14.0L ENGINES (A50854)
GENERATOR HOUSE...
Landoll Hauloll (A51039)
Landoll Hauloll...
2007 JOHN DEERE 310SJ BACKHOE (A50458)
2007 JOHN DEERE...
 
Top