FullMetalBucket
Silver Member
That's half true. Look at the heat generated by an automatic transmission, which is to any physicist, "loss". Autos are not more efficient than manuals, but perhaps in many "in town" environments they may yield better net efficiency than most human operators of a manual transmission.
Really, what I think killed manual trans is a combination of the following:
- Price pressure. It costs auto manufacturers more to engineer, test, and manufacture both variants. When competing with another brand that only does one, those who offer both will always have much higher costs.
- Emissions testing costs of the manual is much higher than auto, or so I'm told.
- Crash safety testing would require them to test both variants, or so I'm told.
- New car buyers have always favored auto, whether due to age or other variables. We've seen this play out for decades, as it seems used car buyers (younger?) have always had a greater thirst for manuals, causing availability issues in used market.
Traffic is also horrendous now, way worse than 10 and especially 20+ years ago.