bdhsfz6
Elite Member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2015
- Messages
- 3,243
- Location
- Northeastern Pennsylvania
- Tractor
- Kubota MX5800 HST & L6060 HSTC Formerly L6060 HST B7100 HST, L2550, L3010 HST, L3430 HST
This is true but transmission lines are expensive to build & maintain. Power companies always try to put plants closest to the load. Otherwise, they would all be located in the desert somewhere.We could argue all day about the TMI effects. I think the studies that show cancer increases have cherry picked the data. As I recall, one of the studies that showed the largest impact used data that showed cancer increased upwind of the plant, not downwind.
However, nuclear plants don't need to be located near population centers any more than wind farms and solar installations, which tend to be in the middle of nowhere. With high voltage transmission lines, you have to be hundreds of miles away before losses become a concern.
Wind and solar installations have a far smaller output than a nuke. and they generally locate them near existing transmission lines. The issues aren't the same.
Yes, we could argue the issue forever but the question is, do you want a nuke in your neighborhood?
We do agree on one point. Nukes COULD be located away from cities. The trick is to force power companies to do it.